Search for: "Light v. State Bar" Results 5301 - 5320 of 5,598
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2014, 10:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  That prospect scared the dickens out of the TM bar. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 6:38 am by Durga Rao Vanayam
Many argue that the provisions of SARFAESI Act, 2002 are draconian in nature. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 12:53 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
This is a curiously arbitrary list which now needs re-visiting in light of the judgment in R v Peacock. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 10:06 am by Eric S. Solotoff
All this preamble leads me to the unreported (non-precedential) Appellate Division decision in the matter of C.S v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm by Will Baude
As the Supreme Court memorably put it in the case of West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 11:06 am by Christopher J. Willis
This practice was deemed deceptive in light of the Regulation Z provision prohibiting the interpretation of dwelling-secured contracts to bar federal claims because the waiver language would likely mislead a consumer into believing that by signing the [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm by The Regulatory Review
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm by The Regulatory Review
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 8:50 pm by Curran Tomko Tarski LLP
The HITECH Act empowers a state attorney general to sue covered entities or business associates engaging in HIPAA violations that harms citizens of the state for statutory damages equal to the sum of the number of violations multiplied by 100 up to a maximum of $25,000 per calendar year plus attorneys fees and costs On January 13, 2010 Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal sued Health Net of Connecticut, Inc. [read post]
8 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Based on Supreme Court precedent, the extended statute of limitations will not apply to criminal prosecution of sanctions violations that have already become time-barred, but the effect on potential civil liability is less clear. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 am
  The (relatively) recent decision by the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) in Boston Scientific Medizintechnik GmbH v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm by Stephen Page
”[2] G v H (1994) A good starting point in discussing the issue of who is a parent is G v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm by Stephen Page
”[2] G v H (1994) A good starting point in discussing the issue of who is a parent is G v. [read post]