Search for: "Plaintiff(s)" Results 5301 - 5320 of 178,413
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2007, 6:42 pm
October 31, 2007: Disabled Students - A prospective law student's attention deficit hyperactivity disorder did not substantially limit him in performing a major life activity, and thus, the student was... [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 5:14 pm by Howard Friedman
The undisputed evidence establishes that the Plaintiffs do not share the State’s belief that life begins at fertilization or that abortion constitutes the intentional taking of a human life. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 7:09 am by Docket Navigator
The court granted defendant's motion to disqualify plaintiff's newly substituted counsel and rejected plaintiff's argument that its counsel represented a company other than defendant. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 6:24 pm
The plaintiff recovered about $11,000 and tried to recover over $800,000 in attorney's fees. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 12:25 pm
Superior Court has affirmed a $4 million judgment in a prescription drug personal injury appeal that I argued on behalf of the plaintiffs-appellees in late October 2014: Today's ruling consists of a majority opinion and a dissenting opinion (concerning an issue of Virginia law). [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 2:06 pm by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
According to the Complaint, a model’s reputation impacts the commercial value associated with their image or likeness to promote a product or service. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 6:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Having stayed away from plaintiffs precise mark, the defendant is entitled to use generic terms; no more is required, and if generic terms happen to invoke associations with the mark, that’s too bad for plaintiff.]Here are some of the okayed designs:http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default? [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 5:42 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
The Court next analyzed whether plaintiffs medical battery claim was governed by the HCLA. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 10:45 am
Plaintiff contends that "Defendants made these statements for the sole purpose of causing harm to Swagway's business and preventing fair competition. [read post]
14 Nov 2006, 9:37 am
Circuit rejects challenge to Weldon Amendment -- a federal law prohibiting recipients of federal grant funds from discriminating against individuals or entities that refuse to provide or refer for abortions -- due to the plaintiff's lack of standing: You can access today's ruling at this link. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 7:42 pm
"Health-Law Challenger's Standing in Supreme Court Case Is Questioned; Lead Plaintiff Appears to Qualify for Medical Coverage Due to Veteran Status, Possibly Weakening Suit": Louise Radnofsky, Jess Bravin, and Brent Kendall will have this article in Saturday's edition of The Wall Street Journal. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 12:14 pm
"Gun Case: We speak with the Cato Institute's Robert Levy, who funded the original lawsuit challenging the D.C. law and also recruited the plaintiffs. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 11:01 am by lennyesq
Plaintiffs motion for leave to renew its motion for a preliminary injunction, restraining defendant from communicating with plaintiffs customers or law enforcement agencies concerning the data loss, is denied…” Cambridge Who’s Who Publishing, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 2:41 pm by Evan Brown (@internetcases)
Plaintiffs claims Plaintiff photographer sued a real estate brokerage firm and the firm’s independent agent who published on her brokerage-branded website one of plaintiffs photos without authorization. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 5:05 am
The District of Columbia Circuit held further that EEOC’s referral of plaintiffs February 2005 charge to the New York Division of Human Rights office also satisfied the ADEA’s state filing requirement, see id., at *10-*12.Download PDF file of Schuler v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:46 am by The Docket Navigator
Plaintiff's motion for a claim construction that differed from the construction by the court of appeals was denied. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 11:00 pm
.), the court granted a Defendant carrier’s Preliminary Objections to a Plaintiffs claim for negligence and breach of fiduciary duty relative to the sale of a homeowner’s insurance policy that ended up not providing the Plaintiff with coverage for a fire loss. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 3:13 pm by Michael
 This allows the plaintiff homeowner’s case to continue at the trial level. [read post]