Search for: "State v. Light"
Results 5301 - 5320
of 28,961
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2006, 12:19 am
Sandra Carr and Matt Edge, won in State v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
ANALYZING THE LEGAL STANDARD Who counts as an officer of the United States? [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 4:23 am
In light of the forgoing, the court imposed provisional measures requiring the United States to remove any impediments, resulting from re-imposed JCPOA sanctions, to the free export to Iran of humanitarian goods and equipment and services to ensure civil aviation safety. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 8:44 am
United States, Heath v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 11:05 am
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 9:37 am
State, 2015 Ga. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 4:37 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court ruled in Pennsylvania v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court ruled in Pennsylvania v. [read post]
Patent Eligible Subject Matter Reform in the United States: The Pendulum Will Swing Too Far (again)?
16 Oct 2019, 3:45 pm
In the United States, the law of patent eligible subject matter has become a big mess. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 8:21 am
In light of Cruz, the matter was remanded to the trial court. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 12:32 pm
"Generally, a claimant who voluntarily withdraws from the labor market by retiring is not entitled to workers' compensation benefits unless the claimant's disability caused or contributed to the retirement" (Matter of Losquadro v Nassau County Police Dept., 225 AD3d 1083, 1084 [3d Dept 2024] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; accord Matter of Digbasanis v Pelham Bay Donuts Inc., 224 AD3d 1047, 1048-1049 [3d Dept 2024]; Matter of… [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 12:32 pm
"Generally, a claimant who voluntarily withdraws from the labor market by retiring is not entitled to workers' compensation benefits unless the claimant's disability caused or contributed to the retirement" (Matter of Losquadro v Nassau County Police Dept., 225 AD3d 1083, 1084 [3d Dept 2024] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; accord Matter of Digbasanis v Pelham Bay Donuts Inc., 224 AD3d 1047, 1048-1049 [3d Dept 2024]; Matter of… [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 8:33 am
Weinfeld (recognizing tort of false light invasion of privacy.) [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 5:51 am
The restriction that is the subject of the lawsuit states that lighting systems which may be offensive to adjacent neighbors are unacceptable. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 11:16 am
The Supreme Court of the United States recognized in Southland Corp. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 5:31 am
State v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 9:28 am
In United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 4:00 am
In Bayatyan v. [read post]