Search for: "United States v. Burden" Results 5301 - 5320 of 9,604
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2013, 3:25 pm by James Yang
Advantage of delayed patent prosecution for drafting claims Upon filing a patent application with the United States Patent and Trademark Office, your invention receives patent pending status. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 6:20 am by Leland E. Beck
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia vacated more Department of Education (DOE) “for-profit college” student loan funding rules on June 30. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 4:45 am by SHG
.* Senior United States District Judge Frederic Block of the Eastern District of New York says it’s time to end this travesty. [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 4:46 am
" Additionally, Goodyear points out that the limitations period was not at issue in Bazemore because claims brought by the United States were not subject to section 706(e). [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 5:11 pm by Tim Paone and Kenneth Bley
The ordinance itself provides that it will not apply to rental units until a 2009 appellate court decision, Palmer/Sixth Street Properties, L.P. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 5:11 pm by Tim Paone
The ordinance itself provides that it will not apply to rental units until a 2009 appellate court decision, Palmer/Sixth Street Properties, L.P. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2021, 5:13 am by SHG
Compare Stevens, 559 U.S. at 467, 482 (upholding the lower court’s strict scrutiny analysis using the overbreadth doctrine) with United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2024, 9:05 pm by Kyle Bradley
Sellers: The United States is unique among peer nations in placing the burden of registering to vote on individuals. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:48 am
In affirming the district court's decision, the United States Supreme Court relied on the ‘collective entity‘ doctrine. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 8:38 am by John Elwood
United States, 19-7320, a sequel to Stokeling v. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 6:00 am by Jordan Brunner
Lastly, Kaspersky claims that it has standing to assert Fifth Amendment due process rights because it has “substantial connections” to the United States based on its employment of 300 people in Massachusetts and its sales to customers and thus, comes under the framework announced in United States v. [read post]