Search for: "Department of Public Safety Does"
Results 5321 - 5340
of 8,977
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2015, 11:15 am
Department of Energy technical analysis of the 2015 version determined only about 6 of the 77 total changes actually increase energy savings. [read post]
15 May 2015, 9:10 am
Department of Transportation challenging a federal timeline for oil-train safety. [read post]
15 May 2015, 7:03 am
This systematic bias, however, does not necessarily mean that both side’s expert witnesses will necessarily be unrepresentative or unscientific. [read post]
14 May 2015, 1:03 pm
If your criminal defense attorney successfully argues for the home confinement option, you will enter the Intensive Supervision Program under the watchful eye of Nevada’s Department of Public Safety. [read post]
14 May 2015, 1:03 pm
If your criminal defense attorney successfully argues for the home confinement option, you will enter the Intensive Supervision Program under the watchful eye of Nevada’s Department of Public Safety. [read post]
14 May 2015, 1:03 pm
If your criminal defense attorney successfully argues for the home confinement option, you will enter the Intensive Supervision Program under the watchful eye of Nevada’s Department of Public Safety. [read post]
14 May 2015, 8:59 am
Americans Deserve a Bill That Protects Them from Dangerous Chemicals <> House Health Subcommittee Vote on Microbead-Free Waters Act - background, H.R. 1321, the Microbead-Free Waters Act, statements, webcast H.R. 1321: Microbead-Free Waters Act of 2015 <> DOE Labs Fuel Advancements in Nuclear Tech - The Subcommittee on Energy held a hearing to examine… [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:28 am
Questions about the safety and efficacy of FDA-approved uses of medical products persist long after their entry onto the market. [read post]
13 May 2015, 7:00 pm
In Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 11:46 am
What are these public safety concerns? [read post]
13 May 2015, 8:06 am
However, it does not specify exact time limits. [read post]
12 May 2015, 4:42 pm
When a libel case involves (as this one does) a matter of public concern, a court must decide whether the plaintiff is (1) a public official or public figure, or (2) a private figure. [read post]
12 May 2015, 1:10 pm
The underlying principle of such a law is that it is in the public interest to disclose wrongdoing in government departments or its agencies as silence would only result in greater harm. [read post]
12 May 2015, 12:51 pm
On these questions, the Court of Appeal held that (1) compliance with a noise ordinance does not foreclose a fair argument of significant noise impacts under CEQA, and (2) factual non-expert evidence can form the basis for a fair argument with respect to noise and traffic safety impacts. [read post]
12 May 2015, 12:28 pm
The numbers tell a different story when one consults the National Traffic Safety Administration. [read post]
11 May 2015, 11:54 am
” Texas Health & Safety Code, Sec. 165.002. [read post]
7 May 2015, 11:31 am
As recently as 1988, august international committees, writing for the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, acknowledged the evidentiary insufficiency of any claim that silica caused lung cancer[6]. [read post]
7 May 2015, 6:34 am
Moreover, existing New York laws require that an employer’s decision to disqualify an applicant be justified using a variety of reasons and ultimately based on a direct correlation between the nature of the job and the applicant’s criminal history, an unreasonable risk to property, or the safety or welfare of specific individuals or the general public. [read post]
6 May 2015, 10:40 am
Unlike other whistleblower laws, such as the False Claims Act, which has a statutory minimum award of 15% of any recovery, the Motor Vehicle Safety Whistleblower Act does not have a mandatory floor. [read post]
5 May 2015, 5:03 pm
” The substantive portion of the BEO concludes by stating: “This Executive Order is not intended to create, and does not create any rights or benefits, whether substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity, against the State of California, its agencies, departments, entities, officers, employees, or any other person. [read post]
