Search for: "Little v State"
Results 5321 - 5340
of 23,799
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2011, 12:23 pm
” The Ninth Circuit’s December 7 ruling in Red Lion Hotels Franchising, Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2014, 12:00 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 2:31 pm
There is little evidence that the public in states that elect judges views the courts as illegitimate. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
Incorporation has vastly expanded the Court’s authority to regulate the states, without the sanction of legislation or amendment under Article V. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 4:00 am
" As the United States Supreme Court commented in Pickering v Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563* “Free and unhindered debate on matters of public importance constitutes a core value of the First Amendment. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 9:57 am
It’s easy to read United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 8:26 am
Ball State Univ. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 5:54 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 9:40 am
There was another attempt in 1999 with Ortiz v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 6:38 pm
State v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 11:42 pm
Today's SCOTUS decision in Beckles v. [read post]
25 Dec 2010, 2:05 pm
McMillan of the National Center for State Courts, have published A Framework for Logical Data Models in Courts, Data Administration Newsletter, v. 14, no. 2 (December 1, 2010). [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 3:21 pm
The Order in Windsor Jewelers, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 8:18 pm
In the new case, United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 5:56 am
The court concluded the term `3rd parties’ in the Government's proposal made little sense when the condition was aimed at employers. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
7 May 2022, 9:13 am
State v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 2:26 pm
And when you're teaching or writing about something for decades, not surprisingly, you get to have a little depth in the field. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 12:55 pm
The United States Supreme Court has described Rule 10b-5 as “a judicial oak which has grown from little more than a legislative acorn. [read post]
