Search for: "People v David S."
Results 5321 - 5340
of 5,862
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2013, 2:00 pm
(In fact, the opinion references David S. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 6:21 am
Casto’s article “Dear Sister Antillico …”: The Story of Kirksey v. [read post]
24 May 2016, 7:56 pm
The object is not merely to maximize the welfare of the funds’ ultimate investors, the people of Norway (through its state apparatus), but also to use the fund to advance Norwegian public policy in the international sphere and within the domestic legal systems of other states to achieve a measure of horizontal harmonization of corporate governance. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:28 am
Some view such limitations as a hallmark of good government, forcing governments to live within their means and seek voter approval to expand; others see such caps as artificial constraints which strip authority from the people’s elected representatives and channel revenue generation efforts into other, often less e [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 3:56 am
Back on PatLit, David Berry considers liability for "divided" patent infringement -- and how a recent US Court of Appeal for the Federal Circuit decision in BMC v Paymentech has avoided tackling it full-on. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 9:49 pm
The lawsuit is entitled The Authors Guild, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court in Tinker v. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 3:54 am
It's always a shock to defendants that people they know so well, worked with, trusted, have turned their backs on them because they fear the government. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:49 am
The only people to have colleges named after them in both Oxford and Cambridge are Jesus, St John, Wolfson ... and CATS! [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:13 am
Even some of the people involved in the drafting of California’s Senate Bill 94 (“SB 94?) [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 6:36 am
Pataki, 165 F.Supp. 2d 266, 300 (N.D.N.Y. 2001) (testimony on state’s purchase of tribal land); Denson v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:04 pm
Earlier this year in Yates v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 12:55 pm
The subcommittee will hear testimony from David Norquist, the deputy secretary of defense. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 8:21 am
”Arch v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm
This is particularly so given the Supreme Court’s holding in 1989 in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 10:02 am
., what people say and think about you. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 12:49 am
David Lawrenson, a good egg in the property investment business. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 7:30 am
The threat of judicial action, such as the specter of overturning Roe v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 7:07 am
Laura Wittern-Keller and Raymond Haberski show how the Supreme Court's unanimous 1952 ruling in Burstyn's favor sparked a chain of litigation that eventually brought filmmaking under the protective umbrella of the First Amendment, overturning its long-outdated decision in Mutual v. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 9:14 am
However, in Bates v. [read post]
