Search for: "People v Thomas" Results 5321 - 5340 of 5,938
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2019, 11:29 am by Peter Margulies
The March 6 decision by Judge Richard Seeborg of the Northern District of California in California v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 8:10 am
The Court stated that "it is clear… that the SEC understand[s] the company to be those who act for the company … And that is a small, relatively small group of people, like the board of directors, who have management discretion to run the business and affairs of the company. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
FDA Advances Program for Real-World Evidence February 27, 2023 | Blair Bean Robertson, Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals FDA’s approach to evidence-based decision-making may not be addressed to the right people. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 7:57 am by Steve Hall
Hood tried to prove that the judge who presided over the case, Verla Sue Holland, and the prosecutor, Thomas S. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 2:00 pm by Melanie Fontes
In an apparent attempt to reverse the rogue decision, the majority of active judges on the Ninth Circuit authorized en banc review.[3]  But because the Ninth Circuit has so many judges, it alone among the federal appellate courts employs a limited en banc review, where only eleven of its active judges sit en banc, consisting of the chief judge and ten other active judges who are randomly selected.[4] Accordingly, limited en banc allows for “minority rule” in a subset of cases,[5]… [read post]
1 May 2016, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
 Under EU law in force since May 2011, people must give their consent before an anti-ad-blocker script can run and hide content on a page. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 3:16 pm by Orin Kerr
When the police arrived, and the people in the house had trouble identifying whose house it was, the police arrested everyone for trespass. [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:29 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
The rhetoric-reality gap is attributable in part to a dilemma the Court created for itself: its national policy favoring arbitration is constitutionally-suspect unless people assent, yet letting people make what contracts they wish would prevent implementing the national policy. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 9:52 pm
WHEREAS, the Ninth Amendment of the United States Constitution states "[t]he enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people" and the Tenth Amendment states "[t]he powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 5:57 am
Remember, Thomas Jefferson and others, the founders, suggested that impeachment was an organic process. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 4:42 am by Emma Snell
It’s also unlikely officials would bring only obstruction charges amid several other Trump investigations into potential crimes, the people said. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 9:06 pm by Prof. Akhil Reed Amar, guest-blogging
Here is what I say about this precise topic in Chapter 4 of my new book, in my discussion of the landmark Warren Court opinion of New York Times v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 8:57 pm by Joey Fishkin
 This is a claim articulated most fully (so far) by Justice Scalia in his brief concurrence in Ricci v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 11:06 pm by Jeff Gamso
The execution of a person who can show that he is innocent comes perilously close to simple murder.Herrera v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:35 am by centerforartlaw
Patty Gerstenblith, Distinguished Research Professor of Law at DePaul University, stated during her keynote address at the Kernochan Center’s symposium on Protecting Cultural Property, the significance of the destruction of cultural heritage sites “lies in the people. [read post]