Search for: "Samsung"
Results 5321 - 5340
of 6,717
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2021, 9:07 pm
In July, Huawei announced a license deal with an unnamed Volkswagen supplier, and the company has always had significant patent licensing revenues, with Apple and Samsung presumably being its top two licensees. [read post]
14 May 2013, 10:53 am
Based on the scope of the asserted claim 1 and the claim construction based on which the ITC judge is now going to determine infringement, I can't see why HTC's tethering would infringe and, for example, Samsung's (since this is the market leader and also the Android device maker whose tethering feature I use very frequently) would not.If you'd like to be updated on the smartphone patent disputes and other intellectual property matters I cover, please subscribe to my RSS feed (in the… [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 5:00 am
District Court for the Northern District of California, companies including Apple, Blackberry, Ericsson, Intel, LG, MediaTek, Huawei and Samsung have testified on behalf of the Federal Trade Commission’s application of traditional antitrust concepts to rein in practices by Qualcomm that harm consumers, competition, and innovation. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 4:54 am
There are companies out there who give lip service to this concept but, in reality, try to exert so much pressure on their adversaries with their aggressive SEP assertions and outrageous demands that they hope the other party will ultimately offer non-SEP-related concessions (that's clearly Samsung's strategy vis-à-vis Apple, and it's also Google's/Motorola's strategy, though antitrust interventions and court decisions have so far prevented Google from succeeding with this… [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 7:24 am
Samsung Elecs.Co., 678 F.3d 1314, 1329 (Fed. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 1:35 am
Apple wants to have it both ways: it wants politicians to allow Apple to collect up to well over 30% (the UK is one of the countries where Apple effectively charges more) while denying SEP holders royalty rates that are tiny compared to the 30%+ cut Apple charges on in-app purchasing, subscriptions, and app downloads.There was a time when Apple used to be pretty consistent, apart from seeking $40 or so per Samsung phone over a handful of software patents, arguing that it was a… [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 10:51 pm
" (emphasis omitted; Swedish krona figures converted to U.S. dollars based on current exchange rate; figures in parentheses relate to previous period)The main reason was the dispute with Samsung (which ended shortly thereafter), and the "lower volumes with one licensee" relate to Huawei as everyone in the industry knows. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 2:43 am
The IP Finance blog continues to be busy this week, with Mike Mireles' post on patent trolls from the 19th century and a guest piece from Ilya Kazi on whether a 'pre-nup' might have eased the tensions between former friends Microsoft and Samsung. and here's something from a former Kat: Mark Schweizer, writing on the MARQUES Class 46 weblog, tells us what we've all been waiting to hear, which is that Absinthe -- whatever else it might be -- is not a protected… [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 7:38 am
Apple v Samsung not to the contrary, for both sides of a dispute under such circumstances, perhaps the only result worse than losing in a given jurisdiction is the spectre of prevailing in one country, only to lose in another. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 1:49 am
As a lawyer representing Apple against Samsung once said, "I'm old enough not to believe in coincidences anymore. [read post]
12 May 2021, 1:34 am
Ericsson's director of IPR policy Patrick Hofkens and Kather Augenstein (the firm that just represented Ericsson against Samsung in Germany) managing partner Miriam Kiefer will lkely disagree to at least some extent with the IP chiefs of Cisco (Dan Lang) and Continental (Roman Bonn). [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 7:22 am
Samsung, and has had more cutting-edge technology and patents come across her desk than most federal districts (and some federal circuits) combined. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 10:23 am
The complaint continues, recounting several patent infringement suits Rockstar filed against Google and other companies in October: "Among the myriad companies ensnared in Rockstar's patent dragnet are customers and partners of Google who use the Android platform in their devices, including ASUS, HTC, Huawei, LG, Pantech, Samsung and ZTE." [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 11:20 pm
And it doesn't always disagree with Apple: it supported its pursuit of injunctive relief against Samsung in another recent amicus brief.Nokia's motion for leave goes into more detail on injunctions arguing like Google and its other supporters that case-by-case determinations are needed to "avoid rules which prevent issuance of injunctive relief in broad swaths of cases", which is the key issue in this case. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 6:07 am
Samsung galaxy gear. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 8:15 am
Samsung, HTC, LG and many other Android device makers have already recognized the fact that Android incorporates technology patented by Microsoft and have elected to address these infringement issues through license agreements. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 3:16 am
By contrast, the Federal Patent Court has thrown out all Apple (1, 2, 3) and Samsung (1) patents it has adjudged so far, and Motorola's infamous push notification patent is sure to be thrown out next month. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 2:28 am
It did 8 years ago for Microsoft against Motorola, and in 2018 for Samsung against Huawei, but the world has undoubtedly changed after the escalation in certain other cases.The more promising course of action now is tomove not only for an A1SI but to request a concomitant and broad A3SI, andto do so ex parte (even requesting that the court hide it from the other party until the decision comes down).But even that won't necessarily help as the other party may find a court that is willing… [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 5:23 am
The least plausible scenario would be one in which Judge Chen would let Apple off the hook while Judge Koh (or a colleague of hers down in San Jose) would hold Google in violation of antitrust law, given that Google is less restrictive as there are alternative ways (though far less popular than Google's Play Store) to install Android apps ("sideloading" as well as app stores such as the ones run by Samsung and Huawei). [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 4:09 am
On Microsoft's side, it naturally immediately filed the USTR's letter [PDF] blocking the injunction against Apple by Samsung, although its cover letter is misleading as to what the USTR said. [read post]
