Search for: "State v. L. B."
Results 5321 - 5340
of 6,572
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2010, 9:47 am
Rudzewicz, 471 U.S. 462, 474 (1985) (citing Int’l Shoe Co. v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 5:35 am
"*In August 2007, Kenneth L. [read post]
11 May 2010, 3:41 am
Lorsqu’un État membre opte pour un système de redevance sur les équipements, appareils et matériels de reproduction numérique, conformément à l’objectif poursuivi par l’article 5, paragraphe 2, point b), de la directive 2001/29/CE et au contexte de cette disposition, cette redevance doit nécessairement être liée à l’usage présumé de ces… [read post]
11 May 2010, 2:46 am
Speakers will include: • R Jovita Baber, University of Illinois, “Multiplicity of Meanings: Legal Pluralism and the Layer Legality of Land in Sixteenth-century Andes” • Louis Berkvens, Maastricht University, “An Approach of comparative history of legislation” • Juan B. [read post]
11 May 2010, 2:40 am
Speakers will include: • R Jovita Baber, University of Illinois, “Multiplicity of Meanings: Legal Pluralism and the Layer Legality of Land in Sixteenth-century Andes” • Louis Berkvens, Maastricht University, “An Approach of comparative history of legislation” • Juan B. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:46 pm
SHARON B. [read post]
9 May 2010, 1:31 pm
And a final example is provided by Article V of the United States Constitution. [read post]
7 May 2010, 11:11 am
" Winner Int'l Royalty Corp. v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 9:56 am
Jones and William L. [read post]
Freedom of Expression and Freedom of Information: Part 1 The European Convention – Hugh Tomlinson QC
4 May 2010, 5:38 pm
Although this resolution does not have binding effect, it indicates a trend in legal opinion within Contracting States (See P van Dijk, F van Hoof, A van Rijn and L Zwaak eds, Theory and Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights (4th Edn, Intersentia, 2006) pp.787-788). [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:34 am
L. 105–277, div. [read post]
3 May 2010, 3:01 am
’ not descriptive as a matter of law: Zobmondo Entertainment, LLC v. [read post]
1 May 2010, 7:15 am
The very concept of “debtor-in-possession” suggests a belief in the chance of renewal which is absent from the “receivership style” of insolvency prevalent outside the United States. [read post]
1 May 2010, 6:14 am
Nat’l Trust & Sav. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:22 pm
Eastland Homes Partnership Limited v Sandra Whyte 2010 EWHC 695 (QB) Following Weaver v L&Q and McIntyre v Gentoo, here is a clear indication of the brave new world of public law in which RSLs (sorry, PRHPs) find themselves. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:22 pm
Eastland Homes Partnership Limited v Sandra Whyte 2010 EWHC 695 (QB) Following Weaver v L&Q and McIntyre v Gentoo, here is a clear indication of the brave new world of public law in which RSLs (sorry, PRHPs) find themselves. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:00 am
The Commissioner of Health barred her from future employment in a nursing home on the authority of 10 NYCRR 415.4 (b) (1) (ii) (b), a provision that had been enacted after the underlying incident of abuse took place. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 12:24 am
As a common law principle, the banking sector has long functioned under the value of confidentiality, largely embodied in the famous 1924 United Kingdom decision, Tournier v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 12:15 pm
This is an unnecessary departure from the procedure that this court and the Supreme Court have accepted and endorsed, in the interest of efficient resolution of patent disputes: In KSR Int’l Co. v. [read post]
