Search for: "State v. Plan"
Results 5321 - 5340
of 29,601
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2021, 4:27 pm
Dean Health Plan, Inc., 722 F.3d 869, 883 (7th Cir. 2013); Daniels v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 3:14 am
The saga of State v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:25 am
California has adopted a four-stage reopening plan, which progressively relaxes restrictions. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 1:30 pm
Mendez told C.F.F.M. of these plans. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
Lafayette v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 8:33 am
District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania in Scalia v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 10:17 am
Supreme Court recently issued a unanimous decision in Hughes v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 2:00 am
Port v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 11:55 am
State Attorney General Lawsuit Exposures Covered Entities and their business associates now also need to be concerned about the potential that a state Attorney General may bring civil suit to remedy damages caused to state citizens by a breach of HIPAA. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 4:00 am
Both the 2008 Agreement and the 2009 Agreement permitted NFTA firefighters to participate in a noncontributory special retirement plan. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 6:38 am
State of N.Y. ex rel. [read post]
27 Sep 2006, 7:44 pm
This week I have been busy planning the scope of the amicus brief I intend to file in the Ohio Supreme Court case of Arbino v. [read post]
8 May 2018, 5:00 am
The petition for certiorari argues that the Ninth Circuit decision was contrary to the Court’s reasoning in Stolt-Nielsen as well as Oxford Health Plans LLC v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 6:33 am
Petition for a Writ of Certiorari at 16-17, FTC v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 5:10 am
Dean v. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
But here, the UCL and FAL claims are based on standards set forth in an approved state plan, and which therefore preempt any federal standards. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
But here, the UCL and FAL claims are based on standards set forth in an approved state plan, and which therefore preempt any federal standards. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 11:58 am
Partners Healthcare System, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 4:06 am
Briefly: In an op-ed for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse considers what the justices’ recent refusal to hear “appeals by two states that had tried to terminate Planned Parenthood’s status as a Medicaid provider” “impli[es] for the future of the Roberts court. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 10:08 pm
Believing that the new state law applied to his home, Donohoo notified the County Zoning and Planning office that he was withdrawing his permit application and mitigation plan. [read post]
