Search for: "Strong v. United States"
Results 5321 - 5340
of 6,647
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2010, 10:54 am
We also have a controlled study in the United States relating to recognizing that strong patents rights spur economic growth and innovations that create new industries. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 8:35 am
Will Canada continue to have a relatively strong record on income equality and middle class compared to the United States, or will we follow the American model of stripping workers of power to bargain a decent share of productivity gains? [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 9:10 pm
Supreme Court case of Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 4:58 pm
Strong strand of precedent treats collection as nonspeech conduct. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 5:20 am
” Cobb v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 5:32 am
From Doe v. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 9:30 pm
This Plan is an important part of the United States’ efforts to meet its December pledge made in Paris to lower greenhouse gas emissions by 26 to 28% from 2005 levels by 2025. [read post]
21 May 2016, 4:45 pm
Butler 2016); A driver’s consent must not be compelled by an ultimatum (State v. [read post]
21 May 2016, 4:45 pm
Butler 2016); A driver’s consent must not be compelled by an ultimatum (State v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 8:35 pm
Part V ends the examination with Professor Tong's insights on the debate. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm
Harris), state or federal court (see his dissent in Michigan v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 4:07 am
Maldonado v DiBre, 140 AD3d 1501 [3d Dept 2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 908 [2016] [“even if, as plaintiffs claim, the loss of the units was not voluntary, they still would not have standing to pursue derivative claims”]). [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 1:21 pm
United Fin. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 8:52 am
United States, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes extolled the idea that freedom of speech in the First Amendment is based upon a marketplace of ideas. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:35 am
The European Union and the United States voted against the resolution, which they thought counter-productive and polarizing; both stated that they would not participate in the treaty negotiating process.[5] Japan and South Korea also voted no. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 11:33 am
In the United States, this movement has been led by populist “neo-Brandeisians” who have “call[ed] instead for enforcement that takes into account firm size, fairness, labor rights, and the protection of smaller enterprises. [read post]
15 Sep 2024, 4:52 am
Viteri v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:44 am
The legal presumption in favour of life: Mr Justice Peter Jackson in A Local Authority v E [2012] (Infra) at para. 120 states: “All human life is of value and our law contains the strong presumption that all steps will be taken to preserve it, unless the circumstances are exceptional. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 4:38 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 12:48 pm
For example, in Whitney v. [read post]
