Search for: "The Examiner"
Results 5321 - 5340
of 162,367
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2013, 8:17 am
The Examiner has notresponded to this argument by Appellant, nor is it apparent to us how theportions of Amman cited in the Examiner’s rejection teach this claimedfeature. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 6:11 am
Accordingly, Appellants failto show error in the Examiner’s rejection.See In re Lovin, 652 F.3d 1349,1357 (Fed. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 8:59 am
They are interested in whether examination-related variables that can be controlled by the USPTO are related to later litigation, and they conclude that "some examination characteristics predict litigation, but that the bulk of the predictive power in the model comes from filing characteristics. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 5:47 am
This presentation examines this question by drawing upon Daniel Hallin’s model of spheres of discourse. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 7:55 am
Examinations are conducted at private facilities that provide court reporters for the examination, and are able to produce transcripts on request. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 6:40 am
Based on a review of a limited sample of claims (200 total), the OIG determined that while PMD claims with a corresponding physician G-code claim generally conformed with requirements for face-to-face examinations of beneficiaries, almost half of the 100 PMD claims without a corresponding physician G-code claim did not meet the face-to-face examination requirement. [read post]
29 May 2012, 7:42 am
Many counties have put time limits on the examiners, giving each examiner 15 to 45 minutes of exam time. [read post]
14 May 2018, 9:08 pm
According to some sources, examiners are affirmed about 80-86% of the time in these matters.[1] Therefore, when the PTAB reverses an examiner's § 101 rejection, it is worth to note how and why. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 9:59 pm
Hirshfeld should be familiar to readers of this space for his role, as Deputy Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy, in helping to develop and explain the Office's guidance regarding the examination of claims for subject matter eligibility under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 12:18 pm
" Hirshfeld also told examiners: "[T]he basic inquiries to determine subject matter eligibility remain the same as explained in MPEP 2106(I). [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 9:00 am
., Board Certified by The Florida Bar in Health Law In September 2013, the United States Medical Licensee Examination (USMLE) announced that the Step 1 Committee would meet to review the minimum passing score for the USMLE Step 1 examination at its December meeting. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 9:59 pm
The tool combines the capabilities of the Public-Examiner's Automated Search Tool (PubEAST), Public-Web-based Examiner's Search Tool (PubWEST), Patent Full-Text and Image Database (PatFT), and... [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:15 pm
Under the COVID-19 Pilot Program, the USPTO would grant prioritized examination, similar to the existing Track One Prioritized Examination program, to applications claiming a product or process related to COVID-19, which “must be subject to an applicable FDA approval for COVID-19 use”. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 9:00 pm
But at first blush, it does not appear to be a radical departure from substantive USPTO examination practice despite raising a few additional procedural hurdles that examiners are to overcome before rejecting claims under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 9:00 am
., Board Certified by The Florida Bar in Health Law In September 2013, the United States Medical Licensee Examination (USMLE) announced that the Step 1 Committee would meet to review the minimum passing score for the USMLE Step 1 examination at its December meeting. [read post]
7 Apr 2018, 8:16 pm
Mulcahy of Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner will examine the latest revisions to the USPTO Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP), including a discussion of patent eligibility, duty to disclose, and other changes to the MPEP, and explore the impact on patent prosecution and provide best practices for applying the new guidance. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 9:59 pm
Patent and Trademark Office that expanded the time periods for meeting certain requirements for filing a request for Track I prioritized examination (see "USPTO to Permit Delay in Meeting Certain Prioritized Examination Requirements"). [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 2:53 pm
Senators Thom Tillis (R-NC) and Patrick Leahy (D-VT) today announced the introduction of the Patent Examination and Quality Improvement Act of 2022, which is aimed at “evaluat[ing] and improv[ing] the patent examination process and the overall quality of patents issued by the USPTO,” according to a press release. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 8:43 pm
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) examiner to not raise a § 101 rejection during prosecution. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 1:15 pm
Alternatively, the applicant can continue to engage with the examiner (which may require filing a Request for Continued Examination and paying the associated fee) or can let the application go abandoned. [read post]
