Search for: "v. "
Results 5321 - 5340
of 493,812
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2011, 11:17 am
This opinion will not be published. 2011AP386-CR State v. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 2:15 am
Hearsay evidence admissible in hearing whether unfit accused did act Regina v Chal Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “The provisions concerning admissibility of hearsay evidence in a criminal trial applied to proceedings to determine whether a person under a disability did the act or made the omission in the offence with which he was charged. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 11:40 am
The law governing U.S. software patents sometimes shifts like the ground here in California – a point illustrated by the recent decision of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) in Aristocrat Technologies Australia PTY Ltd. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 6:36 am
The post KENNETH GROVES v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 5:33 pm
In Bapco Closures Research Ltd and Another v Selpac Europe Ltd [2016] EWHC 550 (IPEC) (18 March 2016), His Honour Judge Hacon had to decide a very short but very interesting point of claim construction. [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 2:12 pm
Therein lies the very reason why I don't bother to blog much on the case KSR v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 11:58 pm
In Gunn v. [read post]
1 May 2010, 6:58 am
The New Jersey Hospital Association posted this "daily message" about the oral argument in Betancourt: A three-judge panel heard arguments this week in Betancourt v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 2:48 am
Carroll v Kynaston [2010] EWCA Civ 1404; [2010] WLR (D) 325 “A party to a settlement agreement was not entitled to claim in a further action by way of damages the amount by which the costs awarded him fell short of the costs actually incurred by him. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 1:16 pm
I reported in an earlier post on the cert petition in Shields v. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 6:44 am
Author Paste Licence CC BY-SA 3.0 Soutce Wikimedia Jane Lambertintellectual Property Enterprise Court (John Kimbell QC) Photobooth Props Ltd and another v NEPBH Ltd and others [2022] EWHC 750 (IPEC) (1 April 2022)These were interlocutory applications by both claimants and defendants in an action for copyright infringement and rescission of a contract. [read post]
3 Jul 2022, 7:44 am
Jane LambertIntellectual Property Enterprise Court (HH Judge Jacon) Tehrani v Bonaduz AR and others [2022] EWHC 1031 (IPEC) (18 Feb 2022)S.75 (1) of the Patents Act 1977 provides:"In any proceedings before the court or the comptroller in which the validity of a patent may be put in issue the court or, as the case may be, the comptroller may, subject to section 76 below, allow the proprietor of [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 1:45 pm
He was 56 years old […] The post Iriotakis v Peninsula Employment Services Ltd. appeared first on Lecker & Associates. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 2:46 am
McGowan v B [2011] UKSC 54; [2011] WLR (D) 339 “There was no rule of the European Court of Human Rights that a suspect in police custody could only waive his right of access to legal advice before and during police questioning if he had first received legal advice as to whether he should do so.” WLR Daily, 23rd November 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
18 May 2012, 1:00 am
Ned Hillenbrand (J.D. 2012, Washington & Lee), Note, United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 1:59 am
Regina v Twaite [2010] EWCA Crim 2973; [2010] WLR (D) 342 “Majority verdicts at a hearing before a Courts Martial were not, as a matter of principle, on that account alone to be regarded as blemished by unfairness or uncertainty or lack of safety. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 6:47 am
The post NADIRAH MORENO v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 1:09 am
Jane LambertPatents Court (Mr Recorder Campbell) Bayerische Motoren Werke AG v Premier Alloy Wheels (UK) Ltd and others [2020] EWHC 2094 (Pat) (30 July 2020) This was an action by the motor manufacturer. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 3:32 am
Drake v Harvey and others [2011] EWCA Civ 838; [2011] WLR (D) 244 “There was no general default rule or presumption that the basis on which an outgoing partner’s share of partnership assets was to be determined was a fair value unless the partnership deed expressly stated otherwise; the correct approach was to derive the basis of valuation from the terms of the deed itself applying normal principles of contractual interpretation.” WLR Daily, 20th… [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 6:19 am
QPSX Developments 5 Pty Ltd. v. [read post]
