Search for: "Caming v. United States"
Results 5341 - 5360
of 9,171
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
And much Internet traffic between two foreign countries often passes through the United States. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 7:05 am
Archer, 531 F.3d 1347, 1352 (11th Cir. 2008), and United States v. [read post]
25 Dec 2013, 6:16 am
[Lykins] also agreed to ‘”submit his person, residence and curtilage, office or vehicle to a search, upon direction and discretion of the United States Probation Office. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 9:19 am
Chafin, a United States citizen, married Ms. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 6:05 am
Neither this opinion nor any news stories I can find online explains how he came to be charged. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 5:29 pm
CASE: Cancellation of Removal for Permanent Residents CLIENT: Guatemalan (Green card holder) LOCATION: El Paso Immigration Court in Texas Our client came to the United States in 1987 when she was a child. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 12:46 pm
” In 2000, the Supreme Court of the United States in its decision in Troxel v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 1:02 am
On Appeal to the United States Supreme Court, Steele v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 10:01 am
Judge Leon notes that the Supreme Court took the Jones decision as an opportunity to revisit the Smith decision, because there was an earlier warrantless tracking device opinion, United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 9:34 am
United States, No. 13-127, one of the cases that was GVRed (grant, vacate, remand) in light of Williams v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 12:41 pm
“This case,” the judge wrote, “is yet the latest chapter in the judiciary’s continuing challenge to balance the national security interests of the United States with the individual liberties of our citizens. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 8:54 am
Mendoza testified that the separation came after Mr. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 8:41 am
ABTO and MZTO were both United States' citizens. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 8:41 am
She came to the United States illegally at the end of 2004. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 1:50 am
In Ritchie v. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 9:41 pm
United States, declaring that a religious duty to engage in polygamy was not a defense to a federal law against bigamy. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 8:41 am
A similar but much more expansive point has been made in the United States, by legal scholar Randy Barnett, who has repeatedly argued for a converse “presumption of liberty” where state action challenges the personal liberty of individuals. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 6:29 am
In Nelson v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 7:20 am
On Tuesday, the Court dismissed the union organizing case UNITE Here Local 355 v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 10:50 pm
United States v. [read post]
