Search for: "Fell v. Fell"
Results 5341 - 5360
of 12,276
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
A New York City Sanitation Department [DSNY] employee [Plaintiff] sustained injuries when he tripped and fell on a public sidewalk while working. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 2:30 pm
Supreme Court ruled in Atkins v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 5:53 pm
Judge Hardiman opened United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 9:38 am
County Jail deputiesUnited States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 7:47 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 1:25 pm
”Thus, the MCOA concluded that the trial court’s determination Walker reasonably expended 167 hours rather than the 217 billed on defendant’s case fell within “the range of principled outcomes. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 3:01 pm
The case in question is SAS Institute Inc v World Programming Ltd [2013] EWHC 69 (Ch), decided last Friday by Mr Justice Arnold, on the return of that case from its "holiday" in Luxembourg. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 7:32 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 6:26 am
The petitioners in Feng v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
" A county correction officer, Ronald Farina, slipped and fell while performing his rounds at a county correctional facility. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 11:06 am
Implicitly marking the 20th anniversary of its seminal decision in Knight v. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 1:53 pm
The raised portion of the sidewalk where plaintiff fell had been well known. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 2:24 pm
Bruen, and the tech privacy implications of Dobbs v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 4:22 am
Supp. 2d 606 (D.N.J. 2007), the district court ruled in favor of the insured, a teacher who fell and injured himself. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 3:06 am
In Merrell v. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 2:53 am
The Court, in substantiating their stance, look to the Court of Appeals case People v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 12:59 pm
In the landmark 1973 Supreme Court case Frontiero v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
As the Appellate Division characterized Probationer's appointment as being "subject to [satisfactory completion of] a one-year probationary period," presumably his probationary period fell within the ambit of 4 NYCRR 4.5(b)(1) by operation of law.The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2019/2019_01692.htm [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 12:27 am
Coenraad Visserin turn).The parties in the long-running BMW v Grandmarkdispute are all too familiar with the camel-esque nature of parts of the Designs Act. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 9:50 am
In Stresscon Corp. v. [read post]