Search for: "LaBelle v. LaBelle" Results 5341 - 5360 of 12,193
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2012, 11:04 am by Bruce E. Boyden
The specific issue in Kirtsaeng involves used textbooks, but it could just as easily apply to watches with a copyrighted logo on the back (the good at issue in Omega), shampoo with a copyrighted label on the bottle (Quality King v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 2:28 pm by Nick Pengelley
Finally, the court also determined that record labels and recording artists should not be eligible for royalties from movie and TV soundtracks, as they are considered categorically different than traditional sound recording: Re: Sound v. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 11:02 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Wyeth found no obstacle to suits against automakers in Williamson v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 1:27 pm by Ronald Mann
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, which held that the toy was protected under the reasoning of Rogers v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 10:22 am by Michelle Yeary
            So said the Connecticut Superior Court in Zelle v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 7:35 am by Thomas Swartz
"  The Court of Appeals was face with this issue yesterday in People v Knox, 2009 NY Slip Op 01156.The case actually involved three separate criminal cases. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 7:35 am by Thomas Swartz
"  The Court of Appeals was face with this issue yesterday in People v Knox, 2009 NY Slip Op 01156.The case actually involved three separate criminal cases. [read post]
1 Jan 2009, 1:47 am
During trial, you walk up to the podium with this nice, organized looking binder, labeled "State v. [read post]