Search for: "Matter of Rules Adoption" Results 5341 - 5360 of 22,050
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
However, he interacted with NAMB over a dispute about his church’s refusal to adopt a strategic partnership agreement (SPA) agreed to by BCMD and NAMB without his involvement. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 12:48 pm by Mike Inman
Please let us know if you have questions about this process in general or a specific matter with which you require assistance. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 10:57 am by Marcus Evans (UK) and Janine Regan (UK)
The EPDB said that the “taskforce will analyse the matter and ensure a close cooperation among the members of the Board”. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 8:31 am by Stewart Baker
Agencies Must Adopt Vulnerability-Disclosure Policies by March 2021. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 6:16 am by Law Lady
LACY AUSTIN RAY HUTCHENS, Appellee. 5th District.Civil procedure -- Setting of action for trial -- Failure to strictly comply with rule 1.440 -- Final judgment reversed where matter was tried prematurely and not properly noticed for trial. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 4:46 am by Russell Knight
“The form and contents of motions, notices regarding the same, hearings on motions, and all other matters of procedure relative thereto, shall be according to rules. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 1:02 am by Jan von Hein
The ECJ’s ruling takes into account the case-law of the ECtHR and, by admitting a “second look”, strengthens the protection of fundamental rights in the internal market and within the framework of the judicial cooperation in civil matters. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
Tenet Bicycles holds a registration for the mark since 9 October 2018, i.e. prior to its adoption for the film. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 3:44 pm by David Kopel
According to Ninth Circuit Rule 35-3, an en banc panel always includes the Chief Judge. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 11:10 am by Matt Cooper
The decision merely would have reinstated election rules in place for the previous 10 years, prior to adoption of the new law, that were very familiar to Texas voters. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 2:06 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  As a general matter, the cases tend to fall into one of three categories: (1) lawsuits against companies that experienced a COVID outbreak in one of its facilities (such as, for example, cruise ship lines and private prison systems); (2) lawsuits against companies that made public statements suggesting the companies could profit from the pandemic (such as vaccine development companies, as well as manufacturers of personal protective equipment or diagnostic tests); and (3) companies… [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 11:33 am by Stuart Kaplow
Last week Maryland’s highest court drew attention to this vital unsettled matter nationwide when it adopted a new evidentiary standard for scientific testimony. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 10:04 am by Paul Rosenzweig, Vishnu Kannan
District Court for the District of Columbia ruled unlawful. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 7:33 am by Russell Knight
Yet, the judge never reads them. 95% of divorces end in an agreed resolution no matter what the temporary issues were. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 4:35 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  This post covers the CEQA issue at the “tail end” of the opinion, which involved application of CEQA’s “subsequent review” rules to County’s partial road abandonment project. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 5:01 am by Scott R. Anderson
Judging from his behavior this past week, Pompeo seems to have decided that the rule as it currently stands is too onerous to apply to him. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Bennie Thompson asked the inspector general for the department to review the matter. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 12:45 pm by Giles Peaker
Otherwise, the rules have been pretty much the same. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 10:50 am by Kate Fort
Or, as Justice Montoya Lewis wrote: However, this narrow interpretation commits the error addressed above: it assumes state agencies or participants will know and properly interpret tribal membership and eligibility rules. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 7:10 am by Jonathan Shaub
In February, the same split panel, with Griffith and Henderson in the majority and Rogers in dissent, ruled that the House’s lawsuit had to be dismissed because the Constitution did not give federal courts jurisdiction to hear such suits. [read post]