Search for: "People v. Cross" Results 5341 - 5360 of 5,569
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2013, 7:21 pm by Florian Mueller
At close of business on Tuesday, Judge Lucy Koh, the federal judge presiding over two Apple v. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 11:52 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Morgan, the following text is curious:By 1897, General Electric was the undisputed leader, and Westinghouse was its only serious rival. n152 The two companies agreed to a truce in the form of patent cross-licensing and product pricing agreements. n153 Smaller competitors were invited to join [*1931] the Incandescent Lamp Manufacturers Association, organized by General Electric. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:34 am by David Post
It sets up the classic cross-examination question: "So which is it, Mr. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 12:50 pm by The Legal Blog
Vijay Dutt & Anr.) this Court has accepted the stand that even a Doctor is authorised by a party can cross examine the complainant. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
With a list as long and broad as Kessler adduces, one wonders if we have crossed the line from functional underdetermination to functional indetermination. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 11:00 am by Kevin LaCroix
Our conversations about law must shift from a paternalistic subordination of the individual to an assertion of enforceable rights as intrinsic to human dignity” (Hon’ble Supreme Court of India – Jagdish v Mohan& Others- Civil appeal no. 2217 of 2018)   * * * * * * * * * * * Liability insurance has become a much talked about subject and is receiving well-deserved attention of the people both on the supply and demand side in India and also worldwide. [read post]
14 Mar 2025, 3:13 pm by SEO Team
They might even reflect the opinions of the people who wrote the content they were trained on. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm by Tamar Frankel
These rewards may satisfy peoples’ desire for distinction and attention. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:02 pm by Contributor
Plaintiffs cannot directly sue people for exercising their democratic right to participate in the political process, though they can frame those activities perceived to be contrary to their interests as torts.[15] Common torts that are used by plaintiffs include: defamation, inducing breach of contract, conspiracy, trespass, nuisance, and interference with contractual relations.[16] Examples of SLAPP lawsuits include framing boycotts as intentional interference with economic relations[17]… [read post]
In most legal orgs, this percentage is near negligible, especially if the org is being honest with itself about (i) how many personnel in putative innovation roles (legal operations, knowledge management, project management) are consumed by active matters, existing programs, and administration, (ii) how much technology spend is maintenance, and (iii) how many projects are purely aspirational with no real resources save the illusory spare hours of already busy people. [read post]
11 May 2024, 6:56 am
 It is possible to identify three areas of current interest in relation to the control of cognition to advance the interests and aspiration of ideologically driven human collectives. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 4:31 am by Graham Smith
  Many people will be reinforced in their view that Svensson took a wrong turning and that linking should not amount to an act of communication at all (the position advocated by the European Copyright Society). [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 4:31 am by Graham Smith
  Many people will be reinforced in their view that Svensson took a wrong turning and that linking should not amount to an act of communication at all (the position advocated by the European Copyright Society). [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 4:31 am by Graham Smith
  Many people will be reinforced in their view that Svensson took a wrong turning and that linking should not amount to an act of communication at all (the position advocated by the European Copyright Society). [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm by Ryan Goodman
We will also provide an anonymous reader poll to learn more about what frequency and type of content people prefer to receive. [read post]