Search for: "STATE V. POWERS"
Results 5341 - 5360
of 41,384
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2014, 6:07 am
Power Co. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 1:46 pm
Tibbs, From Black Power to Prison Power: The Making of Jones v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 4:49 am
Queens College of the City University of New York not subject to the City's Human Right Law because it is a State entityJattan v Queens Coll. of City Univ. of N.Y., 2009 NY Slip Op 05746, decided on July 7, 2009, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentLincoln Jattan, sued Queens College of the City University of New York to recover damages for employment discrimination in violation of the New York State Human Rights Law [Executive Law § 297[9] and the… [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 5:31 pm
Charkaoui, Re, 2007 SCC 9 at para. 53;Ruby v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 9:33 am
Correa, People v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 12:11 pm
United States (1997) and New York v. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 8:46 am
The state-created danger doctrine is well-established in the Third Circuit to provide relief where the government affirmatively places someone in a position of danger that he or she would not otherwise have faced, even if that danger is from a third-party.In Kamara v. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 11:37 pm
In Greenwood v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 4:31 am
On 7 June 2012, in the case Centro Europa 7 S.r.l. and Di Stefano v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
Global Reinsurance Corp. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:39 pm
Let’s talk about Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 8:33 pm
The Court of Appeals took pains to note that the latter, non-delegation claim, has sparked much recent litigation, typically adverse to the defense – albeit with a dissent by a certain judge in United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 5:59 am
On June 25, 2012, the United States Supreme Court agreed to consider Vance v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 1:34 pm
A three-judge panel agreed in Mandel v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 4:43 am
First, it states the “sense of Congress” that the president “shall not withdraw the United States from NATO,” and that “the case Goldwater v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 9:10 pm
Illinois, and Cruikshank v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 3:02 pm
As occurred in West Virginia v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 7:57 am
The two Supreme Court cases that comprise the bedrock of legal precedent for the third-party doctrine—Smith v Maryland and United States v Miller—do not apply to cell site location data, the court found: We agree with the defendant…that the nature of cellular telephone technology and CSLI and the character of cellular telephone use in our current society render the third-party doctrine of Miller and Smith inapposite; the digital age has altered… [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 5:19 pm
Stephens, 574 U.S. 271, 276 (2015) (quoting United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 3:51 pm
Department of the Interior (Cultural Resources; Sacred Sites; Geothermal Projects) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2022.html Wild Fish Conservancy v. [read post]
