Search for: "State v. A. T. D." Results 5341 - 5360 of 23,981
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2019, 3:22 pm by Giles Peaker
The Magistrates had refused to state a case for the consideration of the High Court. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 8:47 am by Eric Goldman
    The post A Thumbs-Up Emoji Doesn’t Mean That Dad Disavowed His Child–Bardales v. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:59 am by Jonathan Shaub
But each largely makes four basic points: (a) The concept of executive privilege is hotly disputed; (b) there are very few relevant court cases and none that provide definitive answers; (c) there are a number of historical incidents, from the administration of George Washington to that of Barack Obama, that are of debatable—and contested—significance; and (d) the legal resolution of these highly disputed questions is likely of little practical significance. [read post]
For this post, we read eleven of the leading scholarly works on impeachment so that you don’t have to. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
Louisiana, in which the justices considered whether the Sixth Amendment’s guarantee of a unanimous jury applies to the states, and Rotkiske v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 1:07 pm by Gordon Ahl, William Ford
The following speakers have already committed to speak at the conference: ▪ Eyal Benvenisti, University of Cambridge ▪ Heike Krieger, Freie Universität Berlin ▪ Silja Vöneky, University of Freiburg  Call for papers: We now call upon scholars to consider contributing a paper to the conference. [read post]