Search for: "State v. Agent"
Results 5341 - 5360
of 11,876
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2014, 10:24 am
In other words, you can bring a private lawsuit under the NJCRA, but only against someone who was acting in his or her capacity as an employee or agent of the state or local government. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 11:11 pm
United States, 552 F.3d 1373, 1379 (Fed.Cir.2009) (analyzing inverse condemnation as a taking theory); government-agent taking by Chrysler, whereby the United States takes private property through agents, see Lion Raisins, 416 F.3d at 1363 (“[W]hen separate corporate entities act for the United States, the United States is liable for their takings. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 10:51 am
Texas v. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 7:31 am
The death penalty was last awarded in a federal case in New York in 1954, for a bank robber who killed an FBI agent. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 7:52 am
One fight an insurance company recently lost was in the case, Rosario Mayorga, v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 12:46 pm
All state laws vary. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 3:04 am
Myers v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 12:15 am
Seqway, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 8:53 am
February 16, 2011): Our decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 2:03 pm
. . . .V. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 9:02 am
All state laws vary. [read post]
10 Feb 2025, 3:00 am
Network, LLC v. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 8:28 am
United States v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 7:38 am
As we stated in Kelly [Kelly v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 7:52 am
’s agent in certain potentially relevant respects. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 1:21 am
Claims Resolved New York State Crime Victims Board v. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 7:26 am
Abromats v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 6:40 am
(iv) A claim filed with an agent of an insurer shall be deemed to have been filed with the insurer unless, consistent with law or contract, the agent notifies the person filing the claim that the agent is not authorized to receive notices of claim. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 8:41 am
ConsulNet Computing, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 3:15 am
Handing down its judgment on 30 October 2019, the Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeal, with Lady Hale stating that this was a case “bristling with simplicity”. [read post]
