Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 5341 - 5360
of 14,841
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2015, 6:12 am
Evolution of execution methods and Baze v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 1:40 pm
For support, plaintiffs pointed to the Ninth Circuit’s comment in No. 84 Employer-Teamster Joint Council Pension Trust Fund v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 8:38 am
A copy of the lawsuit may be found here (Illinois v Jimmy John’s Enterprises, LLC). [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 6:49 am
In the latest and strongest worded of such decisions, the Western District of Texas federal court last week decided Ruben A. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 1:25 pm
In Amphenol Corporation v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 8:05 pm
If you read through all 207 pages of 11th Circuit Judge Hull and Judge Dubina’s co-authored majority opinion in Florida v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 8:05 pm
If you read through all 207 pages of 11th Circuit Judge Hull and Judge Dubina’s co-authored majority opinion in Florida v. [read post]
14 May 2007, 11:29 am
The John Doe v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 1:24 pm
See Pelman v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 8:51 am
See Thorogood v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 4:25 am
Although an arbitration award may be vacated on this “extremely narrow ground” it may be vacated only where a court can conclude, "'without engaging in any extended fact-finding or legal analysis' that a law 'prohibit[s], in an absolute sense, [the] particular matters [to be] decided'" or that "the award itself violate[s] a well-defined constitutional, statutory or common law of this State" Simply stated, said the court, “we… [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 6:42 am
--Hamdi v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 9:33 am
Alabama and Alabama Democratic Conference v. [read post]
1 May 2011, 7:52 am
Solis v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 6:42 am
Gameologist Group, LLC v. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 11:38 am
V. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
Ignoring precedent does not leave the Court in a strong or persuasive position. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 1:27 pm
See e.g., Missouri v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 1:57 pm
In Bateman v Mnemonics (1996), the court there stated that because fair use is a statutory doctrine, fair use is not an infringement. [read post]