Search for: "United States v. David"
Results 5341 - 5360
of 6,869
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Lone Wolf v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 4:03 am
” People v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 7:02 am
ACSblog highlights a recent American Constitution Society issue brief on state laws that bar people with criminal records from voting, in light of the Court’s recent call for the views of the Solicitor General in Simmons v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
Frazier v. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:38 pm
United States Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz, accused by Virginia Giuffre of sexually assaulting her when she was a teenager under the control of sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, has now countersued her in federal court in New York, claiming that her allegations are “lies, disparagement, defamation, harassment” that are “beyond the bounds of decency and not tolerated in civilized society. [read post]
5 May 2013, 12:15 pm
Sanders argues that the Milward opinion is important because it highlights what he characterizes as a “rhetorical conflict that has been ongoing, often below the surface, since the United States Supreme Court’s 1993 opinion in Daubert v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 5:32 am
United States, E.D. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 4:47 am
The influence of a “graduated approach to proportionality” had two benefits; it took root in society without being perceived as being imposed from above, and it even influenced Strasbourg case law – see for example the extensive quotations from Lord Bingham’s judgments in Pretty v DPP when the Strasbourg Courts came to consider the case in Pretty v United Kingdom. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 2:00 am
v Davenport Lyons – the saga continues (IPKat) IPO guidance on patentability of computer programs following Symbian comes under criticism (Managing Intellectual Property) (Out-Law) United States US - General The twelve days of EFF (EFF) Wall Street Journal reports Obama, Lessig and Google have shifted their positions on net neutrality; Google, Lessig slam WSJ report (Lessig) (IPTAblog) (Lessig) (Techdirt) (Excess Copyright) (Ars Technica) (Public… [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 6:23 am
By: David A. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 10:08 pm
Stated precisely: The United States is the only entity with any ability to exercise its will at Guantánamo. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 4:02 pm
This week a French data protection authority gave Facebook three months to stop tracking non-users’ web activity without their consent and ordered the social network to stop some transfers of personal data to the United States. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:03 am
[iii] Just recently, the International Swaps and Derivatives Association reported that at the end of 2006 the derivatives market amounted US$283 trillion, an exorbitant amount when compared with the US$34 trillion resulting from the sum of the gross domestic product of the United States, the European Union, Canada, Japan and China. [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 8:10 pm
Martin argues that the district court erred in calculating his advisory United States Sentencing Guidelines ("USSG") range by (1) applying the two-level enhancement under USSG § 2G2.1(b)(5) because the child victims were in his care, custody, or super [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 2:40 pm
A web of other proclamations and restrictions leave open many avenues for other travelers to enter the United States. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 3:14 pm
Meadows and edited by David W. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 3:07 pm
David A. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 1:41 pm
Discon, Inc., 525 U.S. 128 (1998), the Supreme Court of the United States stated that: [P]recedent limits the per se rule in the boycott context to cases involving horizontal agreements among direct competitors. [. . .] [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 1:15 am
On the ECHR front… In the wake of the Conservative Party’s conference, David Cameron and Theresa May have stated their wishes that the Human Rights Act were scrapped to give way to a British Bill of Rights. [read post]