Search for: "Weeks v. United States"
Results 5341 - 5360
of 19,102
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2015, 4:13 am
Hooks v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 8:32 pm
It's been a few years since I last woke up to a significant procedural order ("signficant" as opposed to lawyers' appearances being approved) in Oracle v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 6:59 am
Hobby Lobby Stores and Conestoga Wood Specialties v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:17 am
The contested patents involve a compound patent owned by Gilead and a second medical use patent owned by the government of the United States. [read post]
7 Aug 2024, 1:57 pm
H.R.9310 - To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide Tribal courts and law enforcement with more tools to combat the opioid epidemic. [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 12:12 pm
Seferin Ceraj and his wife, Irini Deda-Ceraj, both natives and citizens of Albania, entered the United States using fraudulent documents in March of 1997. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 1:59 am
"It was this section of the United States Constitution - the Interstate Commerce Clause - that as recently as this week tripped up an Amish dairy farmer who was legally milking cows in Pennsylvania, but selling illegally the District of Columbia and its Maryland suburbs.But issues surrounding the Interstate Commerce Clause have spilled over to affect more than just raw milk since the time the Constitution was ratified. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
After the ups and downs of this week’s hearings in the military commissions case of United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 5:07 am
United States. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 1:14 pm
Additional Resources: Monfore v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 11:57 am
The United States Supreme Court held in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 12:18 pm
Again, within six weeks of the plaintiffs moving in, the defendant allowed the demolition of the property to proceed around plaintiffs units. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 3:44 am
EvidenceProf Blog notes that in United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2024, 7:38 am
In Canjura, the SJC held that the ban violated the Second Amendment under the two-part test the United States Supreme Court set out in Bruen. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:00 am
United States will be heard next week. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 11:37 am
This would create in state habeas law a remedy for lawyers' failure to advised their clients of collateral consequences, following a recent SCOTUS precedent on-point in Padilla v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 8:18 am
By Ani Gevorkian Last week, the U.S. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 1:25 pm
, United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 12:42 am
United States (271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Gray on Claims) (IPBiz) (IPBiz) (PatLit) CAFC: Another means-plus-function opinion: General Protecht Group, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 10:46 am
Currently, the United States Supreme Court is considering the issue in the consolidated cases of National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
