Search for: "Wells v. Justice Court" Results 5341 - 5360 of 29,128
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2019, 3:39 am
AnswerNo - the Court's permission is not required.BackgroundThe hearing before Mr Justice Henry Carr concerned the second of two related technical trials, the first of which was heard in 2017. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 12:10 pm by MBettman
On September 9, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
Because the district court had dismissed the state-law unfair competition claims solely due to the dismissal of the federal claims, the appellate court reinstated them as well (Cardinal Motors, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 1:11 pm
Why don't the many five-to-four decisions prove that this is a "well-balanced" Court? [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 9:14 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Lawns, Inc. vs Rudolfo Luis Castillo, Jr. and Yadira Ivette Arroyo, No. 13-10-00669-CV (Tex.App. - Corpus Christi, Jul. 28, 2011) O P I N I O N Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Benavides Opinion by Chief Justice Valdez Appellant, U.S. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
  The claimants contend that phone hacking was widespread at the Sun as well as the News of the World. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 10:23 am by Joe Consumer
Reports are staring to come in about today's Supreme Court oral argument in Dukes v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 10:23 am by Joe Consumer
Reports are staring to come in about today's Supreme Court oral argument in Dukes v. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 6:05 am
Casey, I find almost nothing to cheer about in the Court's decision last week in Gonzales v. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 9:33 am by Kent Scheidegger
"The Supreme Court is not well," they tell the Justices in what is really an enemy-of-the-Court brief. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 2:15 am
 The IPKat wishes her well and thanks her for giving him so much to blog about. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 6:36 am by Conor McEvily
Monday’s news that the Court has ordered reargument in Kiobel v. [read post]