Search for: "C. M. v. State"
Results 5361 - 5380
of 6,593
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2015, 8:02 am
L'avocate pénaliste Hannelore Cayre y faisait une peinture auvitriol de la« justicedes pauvres et des proxos », du côté de l'avocaten même temps que du côté du mis en examen. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 1:43 am
Apixaban (1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-7-oxo-6-[4-(2-oxopiperidin-1-yl)phenyl]-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1H-pyrazolo[3,4-c]pyridin-3-carbamide) The patent is unopposed. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 10:56 am
(He got a C on the paper proposing the campaign, by the way.) [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 8:57 pm
In a 2009 “Survey of Selected Bacteria in Irrigation Canal Water – Third Year” written by Jorge M. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 10:49 am
(I’m assuming the Sixth Circuit will allow the briefs. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 4:29 am
– Beijing First Intermediate People’s Court accepts admin lawsuit lodged by Louis Vuitton against China Trademark Review and Adjudication Board (China Law Insight) Core IP issues in M&A and investment (Part II of II) (China Law Insight) ‘Patent Litigation in China’ The book. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 3:25 am
Greene of the University of Wisconsin, John C. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ACTA continues to be discussed and debated: (Michael Geist), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Public Knowledge), (Techdirt), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), Apotex challenge to Acular LS patent barred by res judicata: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan v Apotex:… [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 6:54 am
I’m not sure what emotional reaction to include. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 7:11 am
As the judge also noted, §§ 2511(1)(a) & 2511(1)(c) state that, except “as otherwise specifically provided” in the Wiretap Act, anyone who “intentionally intercepts . . . any wire, oral or electronic communication” or intentionally disclosed the contents of an oral, wire or electronic communication “knowing or having reason to know that” the information was obtained through an unlawful wiretap violates the Wiretap Act. [read post]
7 Nov 2009, 11:51 pm
(I'm omitting citations without indication.) [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 9:07 am
Richards tells us, plaintively and accurately, that “[m]any of Hill’s key insights about how to make decisions based on epidemiological evidence have been largely ignored or distorted over the years. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 5:34 am
[UPDATE: To be clear, I'm usually wary of attributing ill motives to judges and most other government officials except where the evidence is clear. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 7:00 am
United States, 60 Ct. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 12:42 pm
Acevedo v. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 1:34 pm
Since I’m taking the time to respond to Weiner’s latest post, I figured I would also note that he has not retracted or corrected his erroneous claim about the D.C. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 6:05 pm
Swartz was indicted last Thursday by the United States Attorney for the District of Massachusetts, Carmen M. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 7:27 am
’ (quoting Pure Power Boot Camp v. [read post]
The Indian Satellite Saga and Retaliation: Recognizing the Supreme Court of India’s Judgment Abroad?
24 Jun 2024, 7:03 pm
Since 2023, courts worldwide, including those in Australia, Canada, Germany, Mauritius, the Netherlands, Singapore, Switzerland, and the US, rendered decisions regarding whether to recognize the SCI Judgment and to allow it as a defence against the enforcement of arbitration awards.[1] This Insight analyzes these courts’ judgments and reflects on the decentralized judgment/award recognition and enforcement system for addressing alleged state retaliation measures. [read post]
17 Apr 2021, 10:27 am
Kelly, joined by Presiding Judge Thomas C. [read post]
