Search for: "Defendants A-F" Results 5361 - 5380 of 29,824
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
" The board's email to Plaintiff Rash, on the other hand, warned that "[f]uture violations will result in your microphone being cut off and your time forfeited" and that "[f]uture violations may also result in you no longer being allowed to speak during patron comments. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 4:20 am by SHG
“Being a public defender should inherently mean you’re against f—ing genocide,” lawyer Niteka Raina wrote in a ranting email to coworkers obtained by The Post. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 10:00 am by Firemark Law Team
F-BOMB TO GO TO THE COURT: PRESSING SCANDALOUS TRADEMARKSSCOTUS SAYS NO TO DE HAVILLAND’S LAWSUITCOURT RULES ON JAMMIN JAVA INFRINGEMENTSpotify settles with Wixen, bringing $1.6bn lawsuit to an end – Music Business Worldwide‘Straight Outta Compton’ Lawsuit Tossed Out of CourtBlurred Lines – final order: Defendants to pay $5 MillionThe Public domain – no more extensions… works aging into PD for first time in 20 years.Fortnite… [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 11:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”  The district court also rejected defendants’ rebuttal, finding that defendants had failed to “foreclose” the price maintenance theory and failed to show that the stock price drop was not caused “at least in part” by the alleged correction of the LX statements.[5] Defendants filed a Rule 23(f) petition with the Second Circuit. [read post]
22 May 2024, 3:44 pm by Evan Brown
It found that plaintiff had sufficiently alleged that defendant acted in bad faith when it issued the takedown notice, a key requirement under Section 512(f) of the DMCA. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 7:08 am by Philip Dore and Mark Deethardt
The majority began by noting the voluntary-involuntary rule does not apply when a defendant is improperly joined (f/k/a “fraudulent joinder”). [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 7:08 am by Philip Dore and Mark Deethardt
The majority began by noting the voluntary-involuntary rule does not apply when a defendant is improperly joined (f/k/a “fraudulent joinder”). [read post]