Search for: "Degree v. United States"
Results 5361 - 5380
of 6,520
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2010, 1:52 pm
It is interesting to note that New Jersey's hate crime statute, as it then existed, was reviewed by the United States Supreme Court in the 2001 case of New Jersey v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 10:33 am
In support of this contention, Jason relies on the recent United States Supreme Court decisions recognizing an individual’s right to bear arms under the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 3:45 pm
Just to pick one example, in United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 1:08 pm
Phelps, a case in which the Westboro Baptist Church (consisting of approximately 50 Phelps family members and a few others) used a fallen marine’s funeral to further their message that “God Hates Fags” and the United States is being punished for tolerating homosexuality by, among other things, losing soldiers in Iraq. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 10:08 am
United States , 290 U. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 5:09 am
Since the United States participated as an amicus for Michigan, and Elena Kagan was solicitor-general during the time the brief was prepared, she’s recused herself from the case. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 11:25 pm
United States, and McCulloch v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 5:33 am
One of the reasons state lotteries and other "legal" forms of gambling have not proliferated on the Internet in the United States is the fear of criminal prosecution due to the inability to restrict users by geographic location to the degree felt necessary to avoid criminal prosecution. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 10:50 pm
The scope of protection is an autonomous concept distinct from and broader than Art 3 protection even as interpreted by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in NA v United Kingdom (Elgafaji at [33]-[36]; QD at [20], [35]); HH and Others) at [31]). [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 10:45 pm
This is illustrated by the outcome of the US Supreme Court case United States v Stevens which overturned a ban on animal snuff videos as being an unconstitutional restriction on content. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 8:14 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 7:20 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 8:08 am
United States 293 F. 1013 (D.C. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 2:04 pm
Rather, the United States Supreme Court has held that “[t]he copyright is limited to those aspects of the work—termed 'expression'—that display the stamp of the author's originality. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 2:00 pm
In reaching that ruling, the Court examined its decision in United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 3:32 am
(See, e.g., Mendaro v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 12:01 am
"In United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 10:57 am
State, which discusses American Libraries Ass'n. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 8:04 am
United States, No. 09-10245. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 11:15 am
Governments as different as Cuba and the United States may want to encourage the quiet settlement of such disputes precisely to avoid the production of precedent-setting law. [read post]
