Search for: "Husband (S) v. Wife (S)" Results 5361 - 5380 of 6,156
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2009, 8:30 am by Scott J. Kreppein, Esq.
In John Grisham's The Appeal a small town Mississippi husband-and-wife trial lawyer team win a large verdict in a toxic tort case. [read post]
29 May 2009, 4:50 am
Sierralta, reversed a lower court's ruling that annulled a marriage in large part based on the Wife's failure to provide proof of a previous divorce in the face of the Husband's claims that the marriage was not valid. [read post]
26 May 2009, 4:10 am
Resolving disputes involving the payment of a New York State Employees' Retirement System member's death benefit to a beneficiaryRice v Dinapoli, 2009 NY Slip Op 50979(U), Decided on May 21, 2009, Supreme Court, Albany County, Judge Joseph C. [read post]
25 May 2009, 3:34 pm
As such, the Plaintiff's request for a declaratory judgment in the Plaintiff's favor was denied.Fleeger v. [read post]
24 May 2009, 7:52 am
The Husband was a doctor who operated his Atlanta medical practice out of a condominium purchased during the marriage and the Wife did not work. [read post]
23 May 2009, 7:33 am
In order for alimony to be tax deductible to the Husband and taxable to the Wife, the alimony must be periodic and must terminate on the Wife's death. [read post]
22 May 2009, 7:27 am
The Husband was a doctor with his own medical practice, and the Wife had been a stay at home mom. [read post]
21 May 2009, 10:55 pm
    The divorcing wife in Gurevich v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 6:28 pm
It's that kind of common sense that's at the heart of a recent California appellate decision in which the court held that a widow (second wife) lacked standing to sue her late husband's estate-planning lawyer for failing to prepare a will that would have disinherited her late husband's minor son (from a prior marriage) and left everything to her instead. [read post]
20 May 2009, 10:48 am
On March 23, 2009, the Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed the trial court's denial of the wife's motion for new trial in her divorce action in Rembert v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:00 am
  Husband and wife thereafter filed a new action as co-plaintiffs, again suing for common law dissolution.In his decision addressing the new petition, Justice Kitzes lays out the petition's allegations as follows: Petitioners are wife and husband, and they jointly own fifteen shares in Pearl Nightlife, Inc., the operator of a restaurant located at 45-30 Bell Boulevard, Bayside, New York. [read post]
14 May 2009, 9:34 pm
Gurveich, (subscription required) the wife had her husband’s email account passwords, and accessed his account. [read post]
14 May 2009, 7:06 pm
The husband followed the trial court's opinion with an appeal. [read post]
14 May 2009, 2:46 pm by Grant
Trial Court awarded Wife half of the increase in value of Husbands premarital business interest. [read post]
12 May 2009, 11:41 am
HPM Corp. (1991) 234 Cal.App.3d 178, the Court of Appeals stated that a wife who witnessed her husband's deprivation of oxygen but actually could not see the full extent of the deprivation of oxygen can state a cause of action for emotional distress for witnessing the event which was still occurring. [read post]