Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: D. R." Results 5361 - 5380 of 26,906
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2018, 7:42 pm by Chris Castle
We are especially grateful that the Senate Judiciary Committee, led by Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and Ranking Member Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), was willing to engage with our organizations on ways to improve the bill and include in the Managers Amendment approved today key protections for creators and the public. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 5:09 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The post ISS Releases List of Top 25 Canadian Securities Class Action Settlements appeared first on The D&O Diary. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 1:12 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
However, he has not been accused of using the offshore structure for tax purposes (Remember: It’s not illegal to own an interest in an offshore company). [read post]
” Other congressional members, including Carlos Curbelo (R-Fla.), Ken Buck (R-Colo.), Jared Polis (D-Colo.), and Barbara Lee (D-Calif), along with senate members Rand Paul (R-KY), Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV), Cory Booker (D-NJ), Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), Dan Sullivan (R-AK), Michael Bennet (D-CO), Jeff Flake (R-AZ), and Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), have all expressed their support for the bill. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 7:51 am by Joy Waltemath
Three additional features of the policy support the federal government’s claim of a legitimate national security interest. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 3:12 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The post Supreme Court Grants Cert in Scheme Liability Case appeared first on The D&O Diary. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 3:58 am by Matthew Dresden
Rowling, I’d ask my lawyer to engage a China IP lawyer, stat. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 3:00 am by Corbin Bridge
R&D Buildings R&D facilities may be used by companies in the electronics or biotechnology industries. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 12:47 pm by NBlack
The Court concluded that it did “not find the government ha(d) met its burden to show defendant’s consent was ‘unequivocal and specific and freely and intelligently given. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 11:57 am by Thomas Surmanski
Display of FirearmsRestricted Firearms – In A Dwelling HouseSection 9(1) of the SDT Regs outlines that an individual may display a restricted firearm in a dwelling-house only if: (a) it is unloaded, (b) it is rendered inoperable by means of a secure locking device, (c) it is in securely attached to a non-portable structure in such a manner that it cannot readily be removed, and (d) it is not displayed with and is not readily accessible to ammunition that can be… [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 11:57 am by Thomas Surmanski
Display of FirearmsRestricted Firearms – In A Dwelling HouseSection 9(1) of the SDT Regs outlines that an individual may display a restricted firearm in a dwelling-house only if: (a) it is unloaded, (b) it is rendered inoperable by means of a secure locking device, (c) it is in securely attached to a non-portable structure in such a manner that it cannot readily be removed, and (d) it is not displayed with and is not readily accessible to ammunition that can be… [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 7:17 am
Similarly, the majority highlights an interest that often underlies our decisions in respect to speech prohibitions—the market- place of ideas. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 7:00 am by Erin Kunze
  Within months of discovering the error, SDCERS sought to recoup payments from the two retirees, with interest. [read post]