Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF T W" Results 5361 - 5380 of 8,736
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2013, 11:23 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Jersey Boys wasn’t a substitute for The Ed Sullivan Show; it didn’t even allow repeated viewing of the clip (not that this would matter, as indicated by the court’s invocation of, among others, Ty v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:32 am by Rebecca Tushnet
There’s no hard threshold for misleadingness, and while 9.2% isn’t overwhelming, the court couldn’t conclude it was insubstantial as a matter of law. [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 10:40 pm by Steve Baird
By the way, it doesn’t matter if you’re the first to use a generic term, if found generic, it is available for use by all, even direct competitors. [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 9:23 am by Susan I. Nelson
Do you uphold the law because such matters are better left to the discretion of legislatures? [read post]
9 Mar 2013, 5:24 am by Patrick S. O'Donnell
”[9] Would it have been unreasonable to expect Hitchens to engage his journalistic prowess on behalf of old-fashioned slumming so as to give voice to the Venezuelan poor, as did the writers in our LA Times piece:   Maria Eugenia Mendoza, a 55-year-old special education teacher, held aloft a Chavez poster Wednesday afternoon and sported, like so many others, a bright red T-shirt, the sartorial symbol of Chavez’s socialist project. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 7:35 pm by Wells Bennett
This might be a matter of drafting, as we doubt that Senator Paul would have the the government stay its hand in this situation. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 5:54 pm by Amy Howe
  [W]henever a society adopts racial entitlements, it is very difficult to get out of them through the normal political processes. . . . [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 11:53 am by Ritika Singh
” Here is Steve’s earlier post on the matter. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 12:38 am by Kevin LaCroix
Rather the court must interpret the disputed language in context, w with regard to its intended function in the policy. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Thus, the Board came to the conclusion that the technical activity of step A did not interact with the mental activities of steps B to E to lead to a tangible technical result and therefore had to be ignored in the assessment of inventive step. [12] The Board considers that the present case clearly differs from the case underlying decision T 784/06. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 2:30 pm by Bexis
  But plastic manufacturers don’t have to keep records of adverse reactions. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 10:59 am by Veronika Gaertner
As from 10 January 2015, the recast will replace Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
His biography also explains that he “worked with George W. [read post]