Search for: "Levell v. State" Results 5361 - 5380 of 29,825
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm by Schachtman
Indeed, their brief in other places states their opinion that significance testing is not necessary at all: “Testing for significance, however, is often mistaken for a sine qua non of scientific inference. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
Palestine Liberation Organization, a lawsuit filed by American families and victims of terrorist attacks in Israel, arguing that “the Department of Justice’s refusal to defend an act of Congress specifically designed to protect United States citizens should be reconsidered at the highest levels of the Trump administration. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 4:55 am by Dan Farber
  Thus, there is no basis for reducing a state’s obligation below its “mark” (the significance level). [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 8:51 am by SJM
As far as the Court was concerned, the real cause of the flood was the exceptional level of rainfall, for which the State could not be held to blame.The Applicants therefore took their case to the ECHR, relying on breaches of Article 1, Article 2 (right to life), Article 8 and Article 13 (right to an effective remedy). [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 2:03 pm
Since all of the requested information was not provided, the 30-day period in which Progressive was obligated to pay or deny the Hospital's claim did not begin to run as was held in Westchester Medical Center v State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Co., Hospital for Joint Diseases v New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance Co, New York & Presbyterian Hosp v Countrywide Insurance Co. and Montefiore Medical Center v Government Employees Insurance Co. [read post]
11 Feb 2007, 2:34 am
Further to global warming (and Massachusetts v. [read post]