Search for: "PAGE v. UNITED STATES"
Results 5361 - 5380
of 9,966
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2013, 3:17 pm
The United States Patent and Trademark Office does not register trademarks it considers aesthetically functional. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 3:41 am
It is a 42 pages document with a lot of details . [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 12:55 pm
The court next addressed the United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 5:30 am
Fla. 1988); United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 9:44 am
The brief was filed in State v. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 10:34 am
Available from: www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/HRC/RegularSessions/Session17/Pages/ResDecStat.aspx (b) Examine the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework, available in the six official languages of the United Nations. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 5:15 am
Your Lawfare correspondent is ready to go at Fort Meade, and to capture, in almost real time, this week’s pre-trial hearings in United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:41 pm
In criminal context, see United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 9:10 pm
One of the landmark cases in which such requirements were affirmed, Crawford v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 3:01 pm
DiGirolamo issued a 19 page written opinion holding that McNeely applied to cases pending at the time of its issuance, that the Government did not demostrate sufficient exigent circumstances to justify dispensing with a warrant, and that the Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule did apply in the case of United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:45 am
There is a long history of this association in the Commonwealth and the United States. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 3:40 am
The pages were probative only for what they showed on their faces; as to any facts stated therein, they were mere hearsay. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 3:35 pm
., Appellant, v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 6:08 am
United States Dep’t of Labor Bull. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 4:58 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 4:58 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 10:29 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 1:53 pm
After all, as a circuit judge wrote in 2009, “[t]he Judicial Conference of the United States for almost 20 years, and the Sentencing Commission for almost 10 years, have pleaded with the judiciary committees of Congress to do something about the serious injustices that these long, mandatory minimum sentences impose – to no avail. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 5:24 am
The United States is one of 3 countries (the others are Iran and Pakistan) that signed on December 12, 1977, but never ratified. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
In People v. [read post]
