Search for: "Paras v. State" Results 5361 - 5380 of 6,122
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2012, 6:46 am
In the leading Indian decision on the point, Linklaters v ITO, this solution has been rejected. [read post]
13 Aug 2022, 8:30 am by Russell Knight
“[F]raud will not be presumed in this State and must be proved by clear and convincing evidence” Hofmann v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 10:55 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
The second and even more sweeping limitation is the fact that it is the government, rather than the Detainee Inquiry itself, which will have the final word on what undisclosed material can be made public (see paras 11-17 of the Protocol). [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:24 am by Mary Szarkowicz
International Court of Justice Issues Provisional Measures in South Africa v. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 2:16 am
 The Court also notes that the Member States may lay down additional conditions capable of improving the protection of authors’ rights beyond what is expressly laid down in the directive. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 1:29 am
  [This is substantially changed - previously stated (at "sixthly") there are no grounds for presuming that duplication of proceedings would be, without further reason, grounds for a stay.] [read post]