Search for: "State v. Main"
Results 5361 - 5380
of 11,238
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2015, 10:36 am
See Choyce v. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 2:20 pm
In this post, I will begin to explore whether there is a practical way to amend US surveillance law that might satisfy the concerns expressed by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Schrems v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 9:09 pm
The state also insisted that Hurst’s lawyers had exaggerated what is required under Ring v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 12:15 pm
United States, 14-150; potential blockbuster Friedrichs v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 10:40 am
Anderson v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 9:15 am
Obergefell v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
Absent a remedy expressly provided by statute, the courts must presume that Congress did not want to permit the private enforcement of the statute, the panel explained (Harris v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 6:35 am
It was never quite explained why 20 extra years was appropriate when, between 1950 and 2000, average life expectancy amongst West Europeans only rose by about 3 years (from c 75 to c 78 years of age) - arguably this figure has gone down since the accession of the East European member states. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 10:39 am
Facts: This case (People v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 9:42 am
The European Court of Justice (ECJ) invalidated the Safe Harbor Framework today in Schrems v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 3:33 am
As no author was clear, the motion was denied and the Court moved onto the question on ownership of the rights.The main focus of the case was then the transfer of the rights to Mr. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 9:09 am
(They were issued in 2003, and subsequently revised in 2011, but not, it appears, relevantly to the main issue in the case.) [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 7:10 am
In Malleiro v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 7:10 am
In Malleiro v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 11:30 am
We have not posted for a while—that day job can really get in the way sometimes—so we agreed to tackle the ridiculously long decision in Christiansen v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 11:10 pm
Daniel Milnes of Forbes Solicitors states: “While using drones may result in saving money in maintenance in the short term, if legal obligations are not seriously considered it could cost a housing association much more if it resulted in a data protection breach. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 3:15 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 6:00 am
”[v] Justice Anthony M. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 6:31 am
This post briefly summarizes its main provisions. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 6:31 am
This post briefly summarizes its main provisions. [read post]