Search for: "State v. Saide" Results 5361 - 5380 of 57,120
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2013, 8:18 pm by Daniel Richman
United States, waded back into Apprendi land to overrule the long-beleaguered Harris v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 7:07 am by Lyle Denniston
Knowles (11-1450) and Descamps v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 5:35 am by INFORRM
Judgment In this judgment, after setting out the background Tugendhat J considered submissions made as to his statement in his earlier judgment that “trial with a jury will generally be ordered as a matter of discretion, in particular where the state, or a public authority, is a defendant” [35] He accepted that, in the light of cases such as H v Ministry of Defence ([1991] QB 103) and Racz v Home Office ([1994] 2 AC 45)  he should have omitted the word… [read post]
20 Apr 2006, 10:04 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] EWHC 2818 (Admin) (High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court, before Collins J), Secretary of State for the Home Department v. [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 6:17 pm
The Chicago-based association, which has more than 300 members, last year issued a code of ethics stating that marketers should disclose ties to sponsors. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 1:26 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
14 May 2013, 8:12 am by Sheldon Toplitt
The ACLU of Massachusetts, through private counsel, successfully argued a motion to dismiss the complaint under the anti-SLAPP statute, which states in relevant part: "In any case in which a party asserts that the civil claims, counterclaims or cross claims against said party are based on said party's exercise of its right of petition under the constitution of the United States or of the commonwealth, said party may bring a special motion to dismiss." [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:46 pm by Perry Herzfeld
This was said to infringe the act of state doctrine, as explained in decisions such as that of the United States Supreme Court in Underhill v Hernandez 168 US 250 (1897) and the House of Lords in Buttes Gas and Oil Co v Hammer [1982] AC 888. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 3:06 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Employer has an obligation to provide information reasonably necessary for contract administration made in the context of disciplinary grievancesCity of New York v New York State Nurses Assn., 2015 NY Slip Op 04437, Appellate Division, First DepartmentThe Board of Collective Bargaining of the City of New York [Board] granted an improper practice petition to the extent of compelling the City of New York to disclose certain materials requested by the New York State… [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Minor gaps and errors in the hearing transcript made at an administrative hearing did not preclude meaningful review of the hearingFaisal v New York State Dept. of Motor Vehs., 2015 NY Slip Op 09431, Appellate DivisionMuhammad Faisal brought an Article 78 action to review a determination of the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles Appeals Board confirming a determination of an administrative law judge [ALJ]. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 10:11 am
The only near example I found in the state and federal courts database was Mozes v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 1:44 pm by WIMS
"       Despite that fact the Supreme Court said, "The reader will be curious, however, to know what all the fuss is about" and cited its various cases regarding "navigable waters" including: United States v. [read post]