Search for: "US v. Levelle Grant"
Results 5361 - 5380
of 9,108
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2014, 2:27 am
Court of Appeals decision came out earlier this week in National Association of Manufacturers, et al. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 4:26 pm
§ 40101 in which Congress expressly granted to the Secretary of Transportation, through his/her designee, the FAA, the tasks of, among other things, “controlling the use of the navigable airspace and regulating civil and military operations in that airspace in the interest of the safety and efficiency of both . . . [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 8:51 am
This means that the well-counseled inventor will include claims at varying levels of specificity. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
At most, their constitutional claims were subjected to relatively low-level scrutiny under Turner v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 8:29 am
Now, in Tart v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 4:55 pm
On April 9, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of Cedar Fair, L.P. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 3:59 am
The question of what level of scrutiny is to be used to decide the First Amendment question is already at issue in another case in which the Court has granted en banc review, as discussed above. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 10:20 am
” The judge said that the record made before him in the case of Henry v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 4:10 am
Other inventive step attacks were rejected.Finally, for good measure, a declaration of non-infringement was granted to Hospira in relation to this patent, since the levels of acidic variants were outside the range.The judgment records that “Both patents were opposed in the EPO. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 10:00 pm
On the macro level, this Leo would be interested to know how World Moto (including their distributors or dealers) assessed last year's news which reported that the Nigerian Federal Government urged States to ban the commercial use of motorcycles. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
I, § 8, cl. 8.The clause is both a grant of power and a limitation. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 5:35 am
The apportionment question came up in Oracle v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 1:01 am
The commencement on 15 April 2013 of the ‘Raising the Bar’ IP law reforms lifted the standard of inventive step (or nonobviousness) in Australia to a level comparable with that of comparable developed economies, such as the US and Europe. [read post]
12 Apr 2014, 6:39 am
Cir. 2007);Pfizer, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 11:29 am
Category: 103 By: Jesus Hernandez, Blog Editor/Contributor TitleHoffmann-La Roche, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 10:50 am
ELSSCAP also had a cert grant and a 9-0 win recently in Bullock v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 6:04 am
Although the court denied the EEOC’s motion for an adverse jury instruction, it granted its alternative request that it be permitted to introduce evidence of the employer’s video surveillance program, its policies regarding preservation of surveillance videos, and its failure to preserve the surveillance videos in question (EEOC v SunTrust Bank, April 7, 2014, Covington, V). [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 4:38 am
Is exhaustion to be determined at the patent-by-patent level, or at the claim-by-claim level? [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 4:28 am
Judge Pelling found that Shanley granted no such permission. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:37 pm
Wenger, + CAP response Unions Make Us Strong Julius G. [read post]
