Search for: "ATES V. STATE" Results 521 - 540 of 876
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2012, 4:15 am by Louis M. Solomon
  The ATS, to state the obvious, is a statute specifically directed at non-U.S. persons and entities. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 9:30 am by Thomas Lee
For instance, the ATS was successfully invoked by a French privateer (an alien plaintiff) in Bolchos v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:00 am by Eugene Kontorovich
But another case soon to be (re)argued before the Court, Kiobel v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:49 pm by Alex Hunt
The state Supreme Court upheld the sentence, concluding that the Supreme Court’s more recent decision in Graham v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 12:33 am by Jeff Gamso
  Moyer quoted a passage from Judge Jerome Frank's dissent in United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 9:53 pm by John Knox
For a couple of reasons, the presumption against extraterritoriality doesn’t apply neatly to ATS claims, as the Ninth and DC Circuits said in their 2011 decisions in Sarei v Rio Tinto and Doe VIII v Exxon Mobil. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 6:00 am by An Hertogen
First, the US Supreme Court hearings in Kiobel v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 12:12 pm by Veronika Gaertner
Going beyond the borders of the State in which a business has its seat is the foundation for a rebutable presumption that the business directs its activities to the consumer’s State. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 5:51 am by Susan Brenner
Lugashi stated that other California courts . . . had previously rejected similar claims, as had a majority of other state courts and some federal courts. . . . [read post]