Search for: "Advocates v. State" Results 521 - 540 of 12,947
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2024, 6:06 am by James A. Goldston
And, even though the Court did not grant South Africa’s request for a provisional order for Israel to suspend all military operations in Gaza, the measures it did issue place constraints on Israeli action and provide greater moral and legal foundations for further monitoring and advocacy by journalists, rights advocates, humanitarian organizations, other States and international bodies. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
”[2]  In that same policy, the Commission articulated its belief “that a refusal to admit the allegations is equivalent to a denial, unless the defendant or respondent states that he neither admits nor denies the allegations. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 5:29 pm
  Andrew is a lifetime member of the Million Dollar Advocates Forum, and  the author of "Are You a Canadian Injured in the United States? [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 2:15 pm by Michael Lowe
From the perspective of law enforcement as well as advocates against human trafficking, prostitution by definition involves sexual exploitation. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:22 am by Howard Bashman
Supreme Court rules abortion access is a right protected by state constitution; The finding delivered a significant victory for reproductive rights advocates in the state following the overturning of Roe v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 9:01 am by Just Security
”  South Africa had argued that the imposition of such a requirement would follow the model the Court had used in the provisional measures phase of Ukraine v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 4:06 am by Rob Robinson
The authors advocate for the integration of advanced technology platforms compliant with SOC-2-Type 2 and ISO 27001 standards to ensure the security and integrity of arbitration transcripts. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
You are probably well acquainted with its successor, rule 506.[2] Prior to the adoption of former rule 146 in April 1974, the Commission did not have rules interpreting section 4(2) of the Securities Act.[3] As a result, issuers faced uncertainty in determining whether a sale of securities did not involve “any public offering” and in applying case law on the topic, including the Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. [read post]