Search for: "Best v. Com." Results 521 - 540 of 582
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2012, 9:39 pm by Orin Kerr
See Privacy Statement for Juno Members, http:// www. juno. com/ legal/ privacy. html (last visited July 7, 2008). [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 2:24 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  UMG v. mp3.com, while distinguishable in some respects, has relevant statements: Subscribers couldn’t gain access unless they’d already bought. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 12:35 pm by Bruce E. Boyden
The venerable X-COM was famous for this sort of thing, due in no small part to the simple mechanic that the player could choose names for each of his or her soldiers. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 7:54 pm
Dennis Crouch summarizes oral arguments for the upcoming KSR v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 11:04 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Also deceptive mailings: “Prize Notification Bureau” with “State of California Commisioners of Registration” seal—FTC v. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 12:47 pm by Rick
One of the earliest examples — demonstrating that even the courts would only grudgingly support the will of the voters — came in the case of People v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm by Adam Thierer
Simply stated, what motivates much public interest regulation is a simple desire by some here in Washington to tell the American people what’s best for them. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
This post surveys the pro/con social science evidence presented in the amicus briefs in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 8:24 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
In this way, he is perhaps one of the best to speculate, and compare and contrast concepts and notions of national identity. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
A famous early movie executive, Joseph Kennedy,[17] who later became the first SEC Chair, may have said it best. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:49 am by Ralf Michaels
The EU Commission published a long awaited Proposal for a Directive on Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence (CSDDD), COM(2022) 71 final, on 23 February 2022; the EU Council adopted its negotiation position on 1 December 2022; and now, the EU Parliament has suggested amendments to this Draft Directive on 1 June 2023. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 1:14 pm by Venkat
[For my money, one of the best stories on this was from Al Jazeera, which raises the fundamental question of what Twitter's policy is exactly: "Making sense of Twitter's censorship. [read post]