Search for: "C. GRANT"
Results 521 - 540
of 26,612
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
If A conspires with B who conspires with C, all are linked in one conspiracy—even if A does not even know that C exists (and vice versa) and even if their specific plans diverge in many details.[23] (This is why the Amar brief repeatedly speaks of, for example, "Floyd and other top officials" and "Floyd and his allies. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:53 am
The Court of Appeals first explained the scope of its review was abuse of discretion, and that the relevant considerations were the mitigating factors from G.S. 15A-1340.19B(c), along with the additional factor from State v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:15 pm
(Check for commentary on CanLII Connects) Hak c. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 10:30 am
The publication of the most recent volume, “The Taft Court: Making Law for a Divided Nation, 1921–1930” by Robert C. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 10:05 am
The main reason to grant certiorari is simply that, as Supreme Court Rule 10 states, "a United States court of appeals has decided an important question of federal law"—a former president's immunity from prosecution—"that has not been, but should be, settled by [the Supreme] Court. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 6:51 am
” “Late last month, the Federation of Law Societies of Canada was granted an injunction against the federal government to delay the implementation of new laws under the Income Tax Act (Bill C-47) designed to further compel lawyers to report such transactions to the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA). [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 10:25 am
Moreover, no SPC examiners shall be appointed from national patent offices that do not examine the Article 3(c) and 3(d) conditions (in contrast to the initial legislative proposals which allowed one examiner from such national patent offices per panel). [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 8:46 am
Once established, the court issues an order declaring paternity, granting legal rights and responsibilities to the father. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 4:26 am
c=2&pdf=41209 The post What Behaviors Qualify for a Domestic Violence Protective Order? [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 3:17 pm
Justice Masley granted plaintiffs’ motion to amend, finding that the operating agreements unambiguously state that distributions are allocated based on Member Capital Accounts’ monetary values, and not on the basis of Membership Interests. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:37 pm
Code § 153.009(c). [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
One such problem is that the Respondents' theory would render unconstitutional every Speaker and President Pro Tempore since 1789, as well President Grant's Vice President and Presidential Candidate George McGovern. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 7:14 am
According to Spirig, the first authorization pursuant to Art. 140b para. 2 Swiss Patent Act (Art. 3(d) EU SPC Regulation) was therefore the authorization granted for the monosubstance sitagliptin on 18 April 2007 and not the authorization subsequently granted for the combination in the fixed-dose formulation on 8 April 2008. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:42 am
Asylum seekers are, therefore, ineligible for an allocation (althogh someone granted refugee status may be eligible). [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 4:54 pm
” But this is smoke and mirrors: they claim rights b/c it’s authentic and it’s authentic b/c they claim rights. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:59 pm
See in © around religious texts, channeled texts (angelic authorship)—judges are clearly having a good time b/c of the nature of the dispute. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 2:56 pm
It’s passive grant of permission/agreement not to sue. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:39 pm
., Wayne C. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 11:08 am
But it’s narrow protection b/c there are no choices. [read post]
