Search for: "C. v. C."
Results 521 - 540
of 56,457
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2012, 1:57 pm
In the judgment in Sturgeon and Others (Joined Cases C-402/07 and C-432/07, Sturgeon and Others [2009] ), the Court of Justice found that if passengers reached their final destination three hours or more after the arrival time originally scheduled, they may claim fixed compensation from the airline, unless the delay was caused by extraordinary circumstances.In Case C‑581/10, the referring court was hearing a dispute between passengers and the airline Lufthansa… [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 7:20 am
” United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 12:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 11:00 am
On Wednesday, in Freeman v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 10:26 am
§ 1101(a)(13)(C)(v), which divests a legal permanent resident of his right, under Rosenberg v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 4:28 am
In Phillips & Jordan, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
Reimbursement of improperly withheld GML §207-c benefits Baker v Clinton County, 2015 NY Slip Op 08898, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentCraig Baker, a correction officer with the Clinton County Sheriff's office allegedly injured at work on August 8, 2013, was placed on leave, filed a workers' compensation claim and began receiving benefits pursuant to General Municipal Law §207-c. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 11:37 am
In United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 1:48 pm
With Case C? [read post]
4 May 2012, 3:10 am
SAS Institute Inc v World Programming Ltd: (Case C-406/10); [2012] WLR (D) 131 “The functionality of a computer program, the programming language and the format of data files used in a computer program in order to exploit certain of its functions did not constitute a form of expression of that program within the meaning of article 1(2) of Council Directive 91/250/EEC on the legal protection of computer programs (OJ 1991 L122, p 42) and, as such,… [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 2:59 am
Flachglas Torgau GmbH v Federal Republic of Germany: (Case C-204/09); [2012] WLR (D) 45 “The option given to member states pursuant to the first sentence of the second sub-paragraph of article 2(2) of Parliament and Council Directive 2003/4/EC of not regarding ‘bodies or institutions acting in a … legislative capacity’ as ‘public authorities’ responsible for guaranteeing access to environmental information, could be… [read post]
14 May 2014, 8:19 am
On April 21, 2014, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
16 May 2022, 7:51 am
The post ALEXANDER & CLEAVER, P.A. v. [read post]
14 May 2014, 8:19 am
On April 21, 2014, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 8:53 am
A little more than a week ago, Carissa Hessick wrote a PrawfsBlawg post about the Supreme Court’s decision in Hughes v. [read post]
27 May 2024, 3:16 pm
[…] The post PALMER ST CLAIR SASSCER, ET AL. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2007, 8:40 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 3:24 am
MH (Syria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; DS (Afghanistan) v Same [2009] EWCA Civ 226; [2009] WLR (D) 109 “A careful approach was to be applied when one was considering an asylum application and the question whether an asylum-seeker was excluded from the provisions of the Refugee Convention by reason of art 1F(c) [...] [read post]
24 May 2012, 1:54 am
I v Oberbürgermeisterin der Stadt Remscheid (Case C-348/09); [2012] WLR (D) 157 “An individual who had committed an offence, including those referred to in article 83(1)FEU of the FEU Treaty, such as the sexual exploitation of children, could be regarded as constituting a particularly serious threat to one of the fundamental interests of society and therefore could be excluded from a host member state on ‘imperative ground[s] of public security’ pursuant to… [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 2:13 pm
The Court of Justice dismissed an action brought by the Commission against the United Kingdom in Case C-127/05 Commission v. [read post]
