Search for: "Clinton v. State"
Results 521 - 540
of 2,429
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2019, 4:54 am
Importantly, Chapter V of the GDPR authorizes only three methods for legal data transfers from the EEA to a third country, such as the United States: adequacy decisions, appropriate safeguards or limited enumerated exceptions (“derogations”). [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 8:40 am
” * Turo v. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 7:15 am
In City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 1:05 pm
Judge Tatel indicates his view that this case is closer to Clinton v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 9:36 am
The census citizenship question case (New York et al. v Dep't of Commerce, back in the SDNY after remand from the Supreme Court in June) has taken a strange new turn. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 7:22 pm
Neither did Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
Matter of Burke v Bowen, 40 NY2d 264, 266-267 [1976]; cf. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
So too, in Flowers v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 8:30 am
Among the cases he worked on in the 1953 term was Barsky v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 6:07 am
Hajec is Director of Litigation at the Immigration Reform Law Institute, which filed an amicus brief in support of the administration in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 2:18 pm
(The first was by President Clinton.) [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 9:56 am
Arora v. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 9:05 pm
United States. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 7:30 am
And even if Steve Calabresi is correct, as discussed in an earlier post, that at present Democrats control six of the twelve smallest states, it is also demonstrably true that these states are increasingly unrepresentative of the rich pluralism and multi-culturalism that typify the larger states. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
And if he is subpoenaed to testify before Congress, a strong argument can be made that he can, and should, say more.A 2000 DOJ Opinion, on which I worked while I was a deputy in the Office of Legal Counsel, reaffirmed a Watergate-era DOJ determination that criminally prosecuting a sitting President would violate the constitutional principle of separation of powers, even after the Supreme Court decided in Clinton v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:00 am
Apart from his ACA decisions, in his dissent in Obergefell v. [read post]
26 May 2019, 7:48 am
The second covers the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Pepper v. [read post]
26 May 2019, 7:48 am
The second covers the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Pepper v. [read post]
25 May 2019, 10:01 am
This comment continues a pattern of behavior that led to our first public reprimand of Judge Kwan, following his in-court reference to sexual conduct and a former president of the United States. [read post]
23 May 2019, 8:54 am
Four electors cast votes for candidates other than Hillary Clinton and Tim Kaine; all four were fined $1000 each pursuant to state law. [read post]
