Search for: "Commonwealth v. Grant, S."
Results 521 - 540
of 1,519
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2016, 1:05 pm
Commonwealth v. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 7:52 am
Commonwealth, 2007 Ky. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 7:40 am
at *7 (quoting Goro v. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 7:40 am
at *7 (quoting Goro v. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 8:25 pm
Judge Gregory voted to grant appellant a stay of execution until the Supreme Court decides Baze v. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 9:19 am
While the Commonwealth’s “new” non-compete law has received the most attention, the adoption of the UTSA was also notable. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 5:09 pm
Regarding the sufficiency of particularity given in a 911 call to be the basis for a car stop, the recent case Commonwealth v. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 11:59 am
The trial court agreed that the plaintiff’s suit was time-barred and granted the defendant’s motion. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 7:02 am
The case at issue is Scott Lee Staron, d/b/a Lee’s Metal Roof Coatings & Painting v. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 7:46 am
In Channellock, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 6:09 am
Exactly how hollow a requirement this is has now been fully explained by the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania in Reichert v. [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 7:56 pm
Plaintiffs, Kentucky Waterways Alliance, Sierra Club Cumberland Chapter, Kentuckians for the Commonwealth, and Floyds Fork Environmental Association, appeal the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendants, Stephen L. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 8:52 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 4:22 pm
Recently, in Staron v. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 10:46 am
This payment will be made to settle claims filed by the Commonwealth’s Attorney General related to asbestos violations. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 10:04 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 6:33 am
Vacates Grant of Summary Judgment for Attorney on Ex-Client’s Breach-of-Fiduciary Claim” — “The U.S. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 8:08 am
He ordered grievant's termination reduced to a 30 day suspension.NCC sought to set aside the award, and the District Court granted the motion. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 4:40 pm
The court found that the use of the permissive “may” in § 10711(c) of the MPC demonstrates the General Assembly’s intention to grant discretion to local authorities in assessing whether “variations” from an approved tentative plan should warrant refusal to grant approval of a final plan. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 4:40 pm
The court found that the use of the permissive “may” in § 10711(c) of the MPC demonstrates the General Assembly’s intention to grant discretion to local authorities in assessing whether “variations” from an approved tentative plan should warrant refusal to grant approval of a final plan. [read post]
