Search for: "Connors v. United States" Results 521 - 540 of 1,261
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2007, 4:26 pm
For the Supreme Court of the United States, this will be remembered as the year of intellectual dishonesty. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 4:26 pm
For the Supreme Court of the United States, this will be remembered as the year of intellectual dishonesty. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 8:00 am by Russell Spivak
” Relying heavily on Justice Sandra Day O’Connor’s plurality opinion in Hamdi v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm by RHP
Currently, in the United States around 2,500 police departments have K-9 units and up to 75% of these units train their dogs to bite and hold. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm by RHP
Currently, in the United States around 2,500 police departments have K-9 units and up to 75% of these units train their dogs to bite and hold. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 7:29 am by Ted Frank
United States] It's not quite loser pays, but recent amendments to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm by RHP
Currently, in the United States around 2,500 police departments have K-9 units and up to 75% of these units train their dogs to bite and hold. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 4:42 am by Amy Howe
California and United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 6:00 am by Rick Pildes
  The flag-burning decision, Texas v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 10:44 pm
For example, in the United States, those states that have adopted § 2-803 of the Uniform Probate Code would exempt persons who are not “criminally accountable for the felonious and intentional killing of the decedent”. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:04 am by Scott Bomboy
United States (1992), Justice Sandra Day O’Connor found that a federal waste-management law "would 'commandeer' state governments into the service of federal regulatory purposes, and would for this reason be inconsistent with the Constitution's division of authority between federal and state governments. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The New York Times, Jennifer Daskal explains why the court’s recent decision to review digital-privacy case United States v. [read post]