Search for: "DAVID DAY V. CIR" Results 521 - 540 of 552
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2012, 5:32 pm by lawmrh
“This isn’t,” after all about what David Levithan writes in The Lover’s Dictionary, “about slipping yourself an extra $20 of Monopoly Money. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 12:47 pm by admin
District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina; David S. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 2:40 pm
I am happy to report the publication of my article,  "The Corporate Social Responsibilities of Financial Institutions for the Conduct of their Borrowers: The View From International Law and Standards," Lewis & CLark Law Review 21(4):881-920 (2018). [read post]
6 May 2015, 7:09 pm by Jon Gelman
 While the SSDI program is providing some relief to workers adversely affected by changes in state workers’ compensation programs, many if not most workers affected by these changes will not qualify for SSDI benefits because SSDI benefits are only provided to workers with a significant work history (unlike workers’ compensation, where workers are eligible from the first day of employment). [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
Aereo The Supreme Court is set to hear oral arguments in American Broadcasting Companies v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1]  This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:20 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Cases where 9th Cir. applied (a) to a hosting service in the form of a Usenet service, hosting material for 14 days. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 11:54 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Report on David Lefranc’s comments: Seems like there’s no legal basis for RoP in France either. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
[64] And if one day social media executives and other influential employees see some speech as not just ideologically offensive but highly economically threatening—for instance, urging regulations that they think would be devastating to their businesses—wouldn't it be especially likely that they would try to tamp it down? [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 5:01 am by Schachtman
For instance, misrepresentations or misunderstandings of what DPAs can and cannot do carried the day in a Rule 702 contest on the admissibility of opinion testimony by statistician Rebecca Betensky. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:18 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Circuit Judge David Tatel described the facts in his habeas case—in that D.C. [read post]