Search for: "DOES 1-9" Results 521 - 540 of 27,532
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2024, 11:34 am by Norman L. Eisen
For example, the Court issued three opinions from its October 2019 Term on July 1-2, 2020.) [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:34 am by David Pocklington
My motion does not give details of how the canonical provisions are to be replaced. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:18 am by Jan von Hein
Since they are not essential for safeguarding Belgian fundamental public interests, they are therefore not to be considered as overriding mandatory provisions in the sense of Article 9 para. 1 Rome I Regulation. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:10 am by Federica Paddeu
In light of these disagreements, it is worth taking a step back, and exploring the scope of these requirements in some more depth. 1. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
And, while there is no existing requirement that firms demonstrate how AI models they use make decisions, the SEC, under current regulatory requirements, needs only to demonstrate that a conflict of interest exists, which it can do from a pattern of investment recommendations or other actions dictated or influenced by AI models, and does not need to show how or why this pattern exists. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm by Katie Calogero and Daniel Alvarado
The remaining successful protests were post-award victories that fall into categories similar to those we saw at the GAO: (1) improper technical evaluation; (2) inadequate documentation; (3) flawed price analysis. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 12:03 pm by mdkeenan
  This limit does not apply if you have a valid registry card. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 6:36 am by Guest Author
And scholars, like Thomas Merrill, have noticed how most of the opinion does not seem to follow from the two-step standard of review. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 2:21 pm by centerforartlaw
Disputes can arise when an agreement does not clearly outline terms related to payment and costs. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 2:33 am by Dan Zammit
Your move-in does not automatically grant you ownership rights to the property. [read post]