Search for: "Dept of Corrections"
Results 521 - 540
of 1,298
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2015, 3:30 am
NYCDOE had a history of supplying information that was not correct citing Matter of Mid. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 9:07 am
Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 5, 2017 The Justice Dept. should have stayed with the original Travel Ban, not the watered down, politically correct version they submitted to S.C. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 10:26 am
., People v Chiles, 70 AD3d 1453 [4th Dept 2010]). [read post]
29 Nov 2008, 11:47 am
Dept., No. 085082 (6th Cir. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 8:49 pm
Corrections & Rehabilitation, Dept. of / Corrections Standards Authority (Merge) 8. [read post]
6 May 2024, 5:28 am
See Johnson v Suffolk County Police Department, 245 AD2d 340, 341 (2d Dept 1997) . [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 4:54 am
., 130 AD3d 922 [2d Dept 2015]). [read post]
24 May 2019, 4:36 am
” “”An account stated is an agreement between the parties to an account based upon prior transactions between them with respect to the correctness of the separate items composing the account and the balance due, if any, in favor of one party or the other” (Shea & Gould v Burr, 194 AD2d 369, 370 [1st Dept 1993] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]). [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 2:52 pm
State of FL Dept of E/P, No. 08-11213 (11th Cir. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 11:00 am
Because the tests are maintained at the schools for many days, there is an opportunity for answers to be reviewed and changed from incorrect to correct answers, Thompson said, adding that school officials can review the tests and return them to students who did poorly so that answers can be revised. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 4:36 am
In the Direct Claims Appeal, LMEG Wireless, LLC v Farro, ___ AD3d ___, 2021 NY Slip Op 00164 [2d Dept Jan 13., 2021], the Court ruled: LMEG, Wilhelm, and Schochet’s claims for breach of oral agreements to sell LMEG to third-party private equity firms were not unenforceable under the so-called “doctrine of definiteness. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
Further, in this case, the statements made by a corrections officer were not compelled because he did not show that he subjectively believed that his statements were compelled on threat of job loss, and that this belief was "objectively reasonable. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 4:06 am
Please direct corrections, comments, questions, subscription requests and inquiries to Mr. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 2:59 am
" Wolkstein v Morgenstern, 275 AD2d 635, 637 (1st Dept 2000). [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 4:51 am
West 108’s statement of the law is correct. [read post]
7 Jul 2018, 9:02 am
The health dept. says STEC can cause serious illness. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 2:28 pm
Nazarian, 150 A.D.2d 923, 541 N.Y.S.2d 262 (3rd Dept. 1989). [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 11:54 pm
" The appeals court decision states that plaintiff's doctors testified "she will require corrective back surgery;" however, there was no such testimony. [read post]
11 May 2020, 5:41 am
Indeed, it has been held that one may assume a duty, which initially did not exist, and may be held liable where his or her affirmative action adversely affected that plaintiff and he or she failed to act reasonably (see Arroyo v We Transport, Inc., 118 AD3d 648, 649 [2d Dept 2014]; Gordon v Muchnik, 180 AD2d 715 [2d Dept 1992]). [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am
Slip Op. 06213(2d Dept.,2021) the parties were married in 2005, and had two children. [read post]
