Search for: "Distinctive Brands, Inc."
Results 521 - 540
of 1,242
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2023, 11:54 am
”[1] The Case In the District Court , Ninth Circuit and Oral Argument in the Supreme Court Jack Daniels Properties, Inc. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:04 pm
”[1] The Case In the District Court , Ninth Circuit and Oral Argument in the Supreme Court Jack Daniels Properties, Inc. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 1:19 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKIntellectual PropertySurvey Creates Issues of Fact As to Distinctiveness of 'Sexy'Victoria's Secret Stores Brand Management Inc. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 10:25 am
Domaines Pinnacle, Inc. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 3:20 am
Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 7:44 am
UHS of Delaware, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 7:24 am
The judge felt the competing mark (held to enjoy enhanced distinctiveness and a reputation) and sign (a whole can of Taurus) had only a low degree of similarity, for obvious reasons including that the brand names were all but dissimilar. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 2:51 pm
For example, a jewelry brand uses a distinct diamond-encrusted band design for its engagement rings. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 12:00 am
He also aggressively protects that brand. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 10:36 am
Consumer Reviews * Route App, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:45 pm
(Business IP and Intangible Asset Blog) Global – Trade Marks / Brands Brand name vs. brand quality (IPBiz) Global – Patents Is it worth recording changes to PCT application information during the international phase? [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 8:26 am
Entm’t 200, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 5:11 am
Interflora Inc v Marks and Spencer plc [2012] [noted by the IPKat here] established that, even if most people are not deceived, passing off can still be proved. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 3:22 am
Luxco, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 2:20 am
On appeal, Applicant contended that FRANCIEPANTS is a unitary expression with a "completely distinct" commercial impression from that of FRANCY. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 7:45 am
According to the trial judge, skin care and nail care were distinct market sectors, and brands within those sectors could operate in both professional and consumer markets; the strongest evidence of confusion among customers was an email sent to Lumos by Sonia McMilla, the operator of Cloud Nine Day Spa, who had encountered the LUMOS nail product range and asked whether that was a different branch of the company. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:23 pm
by David Muradyan Is Apple, Inc. [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 10:40 pm
On the other hand (or foot), Sheetz of Delaware, Inc., a significant convenience store chain from Pennsylvania, has put in a serious evidentiary challenge to Subway’s claim of rights. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm
Brand X Internet Serv. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 12:12 pm
USA, Inc., 313 F. [read post]
